The power to make and manage federal law in Australia is divided between three largely separate groups, based on the principle of the separation of powers doctrine. Although the constitution appears to adhere to the doctrine of separation of powers by separating the legislative, the executive and the judiciary, in reality the legislative and executive overlap in many areas, meaning only the judiciary is truly separate. This is in accordance with the notion of responsible government, where checks
extremely important that the courts enjoy independence. India has had the privilege of having a Judiciary with a backbone, barring a few
The judicial branch in state and federal level should be free from political stress in order to fulfill their duties as enforcers and protectors of the law. Although most state and the federal government allow their judges to be free from political stress, Texas is among the few states that force their judges to run in partisan elections. Making judges run in partisan elections arises various problems and diminishes the values of being a judge. Judges are faced with having to raise campaign contributions
It developed mainly through judicial decisions. Most of the branches of law, such as torts, have been created exclusively by judges. The Constitutional Law of England, especially the freedom of the citizens, developed through judicial decisions. According to Tennyson, Where freedom slowly broadness down, from precedent to precedent. The precedents have their importance not only in the municipal law but in international law also. The International
When there are governmental abuses which affecting the members of the public, there is an independent institution which generally called as ‘Ombudsman’ and it have the power to examine the governmental abuses. The ombudsman is of course act as the institution that looking at the work of administrative law and the also act as the 'Representative' of the public. Basically, Ombudsman is deriving from Swedish word which has the meaning of a representative or agent of the people or group of people. Even
checks and balances in order bring about a harmonious balance in the powers and responsibilities of the three branches — the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary — of the Government. The Indian Judiciary has always been given a lot of independence in our constitution and respect in the minds of the people of the country. Recently the Judiciary has been called the organ which is most responsive to the needs of the citizens and to the responsibilities of the government. Judiciary in our country
While under the Articles, the states constantly argued among themselves and because the national government was crippled by the Articles they were powerless to enforce acts because all decisions of importance required an undisputed vote which led to a government that was extremely incompetent. The government also had no financial support from the other states which made the economy very unstable. It became clear that the Articles needed to be scrapped
institutional autonomy, these different nations did justice in their own courts in judicial sense. There was no obstacle to continue their existence for the differences in the areas reserved for them. In the Republican Turkey, steps were taken in accordance with the spirit of the time and a uniter state structure was tried to be constructed with the sense of secularism. The founding staff struggling for independence considered the existence of the differences as a threat for the survival of the state
through the Atlantic Ocean are by far the worst. However, near the end of the 19th century colonial conquest, and the ongoing poverty, violence and political authoritarianism of the era of independence was reaching an end. Many of those enslaved in Africa were usually prisoners of war or victims of political or judicial punishments. African people are people just like every one of us, so why should they be treated as slaves? Therefore, the abolishment of the slave trade is by far the best key moments
The current underdevelopment at the grass root of the Nigerian society and politics has made it imperative for this paper to focus on the role of traditional institutions and Local Government Administration in Nigeria as agent that are supposed to enhance and promote development in the rural area. The basic argument of the paper is that during Pre-colonial days in Nigeria, traditional rulers enjoyed full power in their Kingdom, command respect and obedience from their subject; however colonialisation