Huckleberry Finn Should Be Banned

907 Words4 Pages
Depending on the time period, one book has stirred up numerous controversial taboo topics more than most other books. Originally published in December 1884 in the United Kingdom, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn grudgingly delayed for the United States until February 1885 to judge to the obscenely of the book. Gathering influence beginning Mark Twain’s early life around (1830s-1840), he originally intended the book to create reflection of the pre-Civil War South, yet almost immediately, Huckleberry Finn was met with criticism from teachers, parents, religious fundamentalists, politicians, and librarians. Who decides what is considered acceptable within the realm of free speech? While sedition and imminent danger can be more clearly defined…show more content…
As literature remains to be the practically everlasting, decidedly influential, and generally obtainable medium, readers and other literature enthusiasts must ask the age old question: Is literature subject to banning or censorship if they are seen as obscene or otherwise harmful to a peaceful society? Being surrounded by controversy, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned ever since 1885, subsequently instantly after publication. After the first ban in Concord, Massachusetts other libraries joined together and sited that the book was unworthy of their selves. Reasons for their decision as in the New York Herald include that the book is "absolutely immoral in its tone," and "it seems to contain but very little humor," and that there is…show more content…
Dealing with the mistreatment of a fleeing Jim and frequent use of the N-word embodies the South, especially 20 years prior to the Civil War. The quote from Pap regarding African American suffrage lets the reader understand that there is satire involved, “but when they told me there was a State in this country where they'd let that nigger vote, I drawed out. I says I'll never vote agin.”(Page 28). Something so foolish and childish can only be an insult to Southerners who feel the importance of the tradition by comparing those with similar ideas to an abusive drunk. As for the poor treatment of Jim, any attempt to be upset about this is an attempt to hide history; slaves were treated horribly by their owners, “…Tom whispered to me, and wanted to tie Jim to the tree for fun.”(Page 9). The fact that African Americans were owned is evidence of poor treatment, but because slavery is more widely acknowledged. Parents, teachers and religious fundamentalists disagree that harsh treatment was as established as in Mark Twain’s books due to the lack of acknowledgment in school. But when a book such as Huckleberry Finn tries to serve to let other vicariously experience a written history of the pre-war South, it is banned by skeptics who want to forget the past. Some people are upset about how the superstitious characteristics of the African Americans are shown,
Open Document