Are Standardized Tests an Effective Way to Test Students “Educational assessment is the systematic collection, review, and use of information about programs to improve student learning and development” (Hadjicharalambous 43). In recent times there has been controversy on whether or not standardized tests are necessary for students. It has been a heated debate for some time. Certain people believe that the standardized tests are not necessary and that they do more harm than good. These people have
Why Standardized Testing Should Be Eliminated All across the nation there are standardized tests taken during all times of the school year. Students of all ages take them so their level of intelligence and aptitude can be measured. Their test scores are usually compared to other students scores their age so certain decisions can be made like whether or not a teacher or a school is meeting the standards required to pass the tests. When a school or teacher is deemed unresponsive to the requirements
have to worry about students doing anything that is not school related because they do have the option to block certain websites and apps. In addition, tablets reduce the amount of paper that is being used for assignments. The editorial board of pro and cons of controversial issues mentions, “a school with 100 teachers uses on average 250,000 pieces of paper annually. A school of 1,000 students on average spends between $3,000-4,000 a month on paper, ink, and toner, not counting printer wear and tear
Standardized testing has been a highly controversial topic in recent decades, especially because of its increasingly emphasized role in the educational process. While standardized testing is highly effective in measuring the quantity of the material being tested over is known by the student, it does not measure many other skills and does not take into account the affect of external factors. In addition, it causes unnecessary stress and pressure on both students and educators. A review of recent literature
For as long as standardized testing has been in use, there has been controversy regarding its purpose to students. Parents, students, and credible sources continue to debate the importance and necessity of standardized testing. Norman Augustine’s “High Marks for Standardized Tests”, focuses on the positives of standardized testing by refuting arguments made by opponents of standardized testing. In contrast, James Popham’s “Why Standardized Tests Don’t Measure Educational Quality” points out why standardized
The standardized test is an assessment used in some areas to measure student growth and to rate schools according to the scores that the school made on the assessment. Many people believe that standardized tests are not necessary for the development of the students. Standardized tests have been used in many areas for quite a while. Many people in these areas want to get ride of standardized testing because they feel that it has no good impacts on students. Many people also do want to keep the standardized
In 1959, the “scary, narrow time-waster” was born, otherwise known as the A-C-T (West; Mathews). The American College Test was created in Iowa City, Iowa. The ACT, originally for the Midwest schools, soon spread throughout the country, now becoming almost interchangeable with the SAT (Syverson). The popular two hour and fifty five minute college entrance test was developed to measure a student’s achievement in high school and how well he or she would perform in college (Phillippi). Nowadays
Standardized testing started in 1845, schools adopted the idea from the military in WWI and used them to measure students ability in the classroom. The last several decades standardized testing has been used to compare states, countries and college bound students. With these tests we can analysis where students are excelling and need improvements. These tests have come across as stressful, unreliable, time consuming and encourage cheating. Those arguments are weak though because they do not apply
Norm-referenced tests can be valuable tools when used as formative rather than summative assessments. They can provide valuable information regarding a student’s possible need for special supports or enhancements, or what areas may need more, less, or revised instruction. They can help evaluate a student’s readiness for grade advancement or entrance into college. However, assessors must be cautious in analyzing the results of such tests so as not to fall into the trap of labeling or tracking students
providing workshops and training programs to benefit those in need and in the long run, the stakeholders. Also found in a more modern and tailored organizations are personality test which are test that are series of standardized tasks, used to measure personality characteristics or to discover personality disorders. With personality tests, this may benefit HR to the extent that the applicants recruited for the opening will actually match the position they are placed in. Once all personnel are pleased in their