Global Warming has been a political and global issue since hairspray was invented in 1948. More recently society has even begun to look for habitable planets in case Earth becomes uninhabitable because of the irreversible damage done. This harmful global phenomenon caused by pollution and the rapid use of fossil fuels and other natural resources has been lowering the amount of ice, resulting in higher sea levels and loss of habitat for polar bears and walruses. In the near future, the climate change
The topic I read dealt with environmentalism, specifically overpopulation. I agree with the pro articles that believe overpopulation is in fact a real problem. The con article I summarized was Population Is Not The Problem. The author stated that overpopulation is not real because humans, for centuries, have learned to adapt and change. That humans know how to adapt to the change in population and know how to live and create in a changing environment. As the years go by, humans have adapted through
Title: Biofuel, is it the future energy solution? 3. Is biofuel the answer? - Analysis of pros and cons Pros : 1- Availability of Biofuels Biofuels are theoretically unlimited. In terms of availability, biofuels have a big advantage as they are at the top of the list of alternatives. The transition is likely to be subtle but slow as more and more fossil fuel is replaced with biofuel. 2- Environmental Impact Biofuels are environmentally friendly if they’re carefully produced and distributed
UV rays killing the amphibian population The problem Frogs are very important to human beings. They can be used as an indicator if something is wrong in their environment because of the fact they live both in water and land and are susceptible to disease they also contribute to our society by getting rid of some dangerous pests and being part of mostly medical research but also the teaching of kids about anatomy. The amphibian population is declining rapidly though. It is believed to be because
energy by burning fossil fuels (Douglas, Bohlke, Huntley, Rogers, & Maclntyre, 2015, p.99). Power plants that burn fossil fuels, such as coal and natural gas, often produce a great amount of carbon footprints. The consequence of it would be global warming, and it will lead to the rise of sea levels due to the melting of ice from the Arctic. Over 95% of the transportation in the United States still uses fossil fuels to generate electricity for their vehicles ("Fossil Fuels - IER", 2016). Using