Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing? Animals should not be used for scientific and commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals don't make good test subjects, and testing on animals is more expensive. ADD MORE. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. During the process, some animals are forcefully fed, and some aren’t even fed at all. Some don’t even get water. If testing on monkeys, mice, and bunnies is ok then is it ok to test on household pets
1506676784 Animal Testing Should Be Banned Have you ever heard about animal testing ? Animal testing is the use of animals for experiments. Animal testing for research is a complicated thing to be discussed. This is because there are many different opinions about using animals for research. Some people agree, and others disagree if it is necessary or not and I’m that one who disagrees to the use animal for research. Well, some people think it is necessary to do test on animals but in facts, animal testing
We Shouldn’t do Animal Testing Every day animals are being tested and harmed in so many different ways. Some of those ways include, abusive owners, animals with no homes (stray animals), and animal testing. I believe that all of these are bad, but I especially believe that animal testing is the worst. Now, some people think that animal testing is good because it helps ensure the safety of drugs, a lot of veterinary research relies on the use of animal research, and the venom of snakes being tested
In “ Save the animals: Stop animal testing” 2013, Heather Dunnuck states that animals should not be tested on. It is cruel and inhumane to test on the animals of nature to greater suit our lives as humans. I feel that all animal testing and animal cruelty should be stopped immediately. I am very involved with nature, animals, and love to be in the outdoors. “The American Veterinary Medical Association defines animal pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience perceived as arising from
Masauda Shahzad Turquoise 170281 “Animal testing in scientific researches should not be abolished” Animal testing, animal experimentation or animal in vivo testing are the terms used for the using of animals in scientific researches to find out the effects of different variables which in one way or other affect other living things or the environment surrounding them. Animals are not only part of ecosystem but also part of human life. Using these beautiful creations for scientific researching has
Ban Animal Testing Dr. Richard Klausner, a former director of the National Cancer Institute, once said, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (Cimons M.). In this statement, Klausner is pointing out a serious flaw in animal testing by stating curing cancer in mice has been done but yet humans still have to face cancer. Mice are not the only animals being used to find cures in
again. Animal research is responsible for the development of asthma inhalers. Without it, this boy and thousands of asthma sufferers like him would be dead. Did you know that animal research has played a crucial part in almost every medical breakthrough over the last decade? Do you support unnecessary human deaths that could have easily been prevented by simple testing on small rodents? If you don’t support animal testing, you choose to let humans die over
doubt that the best test species for humans are humans. It is not possible to extrapolate animal data directly to humans due to the interspecies variation in anatomy, physiology and biochemistry” (“Alternatives”). There is no possible way to get a trial to be 100% accurate for both animals and humans. A trial that passes on animals may be lethal when tested on humans. The other alternatives for animal testing such as the microchip human organ which works and functions as a human organ, the human artificial
Evidence 1: “The alien’s cruelty is refined, yet irrational. If it intended all along to starve me, why not simply withhold food? But instead of that it gave me plenty of food, all the green buds I could possibly want, Only they were not fresh.They had been picked; they were dead; the elements that makes them digestible to us was gone and one might as eat gravel” (pg 144). Issue 1:There is the notion of cruelty that is suspected that aliens would inflict on humans. Through understanding of the
Rachael Fryer 12 C Is animal testing in the beauty industry ethically justifiable? Introduction: Animal Testing is defined as the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs for human consumption. The hypothesis is that animal testing cannot be justified. Justifiable is defined as able to be shown to be right or reasonable. Based on this definition one is able to gather what constitutes