Using animals to test the safety of products and to carry out scientific research has long been a contentious issue for decades. According to Orlans, F. Barbara (1993), “sixty percent of all the experimental animals were used in biomedical research and product-safety testing” (p.62). People seem to have different feelings for animals; many of them likely look upon animals as their soul mate whereas others might view animals as the essential resources for advancing the scientific research. No matter
use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? The use of animals in scientific research has long been a debatable subject for decades. Most individual consider it morally wrong for animals to be used this way just for the benefit of humans. In this paper, I will give a brief background and description of the scientific use of animal testing, I will explain some of the medical furtherance achievements from animal testing, and I
Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing? Animals should not be used for scientific and commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals don't make good test subjects, and testing on animals is more expensive. ADD MORE. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. During the process, some animals are forcefully fed, and some aren’t even fed at all. Some don’t even get water. If testing on monkeys, mice, and bunnies is ok then is it ok to test on household pets
doubt that the best test species for humans are humans. It is not possible to extrapolate animal data directly to humans due to the interspecies variation in anatomy, physiology and biochemistry” (“Alternatives”). There is no possible way to get a trial to be 100% accurate for both animals and humans. A trial that passes on animals may be lethal when tested on humans. The other alternatives for animal testing such as the microchip human organ which works and functions as a human organ, the human artificial
But what about all of the scientific “discoveries” that did not help people at all? Once a negative discovery is made in the environment, it starts as a chain effect that begins to affect everything negatively. This also applies to discoveries in any field. Science doesn’t allow humans to advance in beneficial ways because technological advancements and medical research are causing threats to human existence, environmental issues are increasing, and animal testing and cloning ends up being harmful
According to “Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”, an estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States alone for scientific and commercial testing. On the surface, this testing has been used to develop new medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications and check the safety of products destined for human use. Research on living animals has been taking place since at least 500 BC. (“Animal Testing”,) There is currently no alternative method
United States alone an estimated 26 million animals are used annually for commercial and scientific use. Animals are being used to develop cosmetic products, medical treatments, biomedical researches, and used to check if a product is safe to be used by humans. Animal testing around the world should be banned because it is cruel towards the animals and causing extinction of different species. Animal testing, a scientific experiment performed on live animals that have to endure pain, suffering, and
many other products? Did you know these personal care products are tested on animals before being sold in the market? Animal testing or animal research is the main practice for testing these products for human consumption. These tests may be beneficial for human usage, but they’re extremely harmful for these defenseless animals’s health. The majority of the consumers of personal care products are aware of animal testing for these products, but many choose to ignore it. Many believe these tests are
millions of animals all over the world are used in scientific research. The purpose is to check how animals’ systems react to some of the chemicals used in producing drugs and cosmetics. Opponents of animal testing argue that it is completely immoral and inhumane to conduct any kinds of experiments on animals. They also claim that there are plenty of alternative methods of testing new chemical products without harming animals. However, proponents of animal testing claim that such kind of research helps
idea of testing on animals has been around for a long time, the modern controversy sparked in the late 1900’s with the Animal Welfare Act and the debate that followed it. Some may say that it is absurd to think that animals should have similar rights as humans, but opponents argue that animals simply look differently than humans, and should not be denied of their rights because of physical differences. They still have feelings and a sense of fear and community. Supporters also claim that animal testing