Animals are living creatures. They’re not a subjected for experiments. Using animals in scientific researches has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Selected people are pro in this test while others area con. People have different feelings for animals. Animals used as their companions while others view that animals are for scientific testing only. Several scientists only think how to making their test successfully without knowing that animal they use are being abused and maltreated. Not
doubt that the best test species for humans are humans. It is not possible to extrapolate animal data directly to humans due to the interspecies variation in anatomy, physiology and biochemistry” (“Alternatives”). There is no possible way to get a trial to be 100% accurate for both animals and humans. A trial that passes on animals may be lethal when tested on humans. The other alternatives for animal testing such as the microchip human organ which works and functions as a human organ, the human artificial
doctor were first tested for safety on an animal? Every year, more than one million dogs, cats, mice, rats, birds, and other helpless animals are injured and killed in laboratory experiments. Animal testing is inhumane, and should be banned. There are many different alternative testing options that do not involve animals, and are a lot cheaper. Many other alternatives have been found to test products which could quickly eliminate the use of animals. In Vitro testing, has been found more accurate and relevant
humans and the fate of animals have no advantage over the animals; for all is vanity. All go to one is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and human place; all are from the dust, and all turn to dust again.’ Animals share equal rights with human, living on the same planet and having the same destiny. Human who usually thought to be more privileged and supreme take controls over other living things and even violates living rights of animals. With the more advanced
Mandatory Animal Testing for Medical Experiments In class discussions, we have expressed the topic of whether animal testing was wrong or not because animals have feelings. Some researchers say that because animals can have emotional attachments and feel, that it is morally wrong to test animals in any way. According to Peggy Carson, an animal rights activist that have worked for years with animal protection organizations, she explains how animal testings are not need whatsoever in any field of
Masauda Shahzad Turquoise 170281 “Animal testing in scientific researches should not be abolished” Animal testing, animal experimentation or animal in vivo testing are the terms used for the using of animals in scientific researches to find out the effects of different variables which in one way or other affect other living things or the environment surrounding them. Animals are not only part of ecosystem but also part of human life. Using these beautiful creations for scientific researching has
Animal testing is “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs” (Dictionary.com). Animal testing happens every day in labs all over the country. It happens in private facilities, government laboratories, non-profit facilities and university laboratories. Private facilities have an endless list of product tests including drugs, cosmetics, cleaning chemicals and shampoos. Government laboratories
Animal Experimentation How does animal experimentation affect us? Name: Winny Stephanie Class: English 1-7 Submission date: 11th August, 2014 1.0 Introduction This report is written to tell us the background, issues and purpose of the debate, the social significance, and the different opinions of each party. More importantly, this report aims to discuss the benefits and disadvantages of animal experiments. 2.0 The Issue and Background of the Debate Although opposition against animal
Ban Animal Testing Dr. Richard Klausner, a former director of the National Cancer Institute, once said, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (Cimons M.). In this statement, Klausner is pointing out a serious flaw in animal testing by stating curing cancer in mice has been done but yet humans still have to face cancer. Mice are not the only animals being used to find cures in
Genetically modified organisms are living organisms; animals, plants or microorganisms whose genetic formation has been altered; this modification can be carried out for various purposes or to achieve certain goals including medicinal, foods security and adaptability among others. The United State of America has the highest percentage of genetically modified organisms. The amount of genetically modified organisms in the human food supply systems is increasing tremendously. Genetic modification has