To Kill A Mocking Bird

672 Words3 Pages
In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mocking Bird, the author’s choices are used to draw us as readers into the story and clearly show the underlying message of prejudice. The three techniques discussed in this essay will be: symbolism, narrative voice and foreshadowing One method that Harper Lee uses to enhance the readers knowledge of the underling message is symbolism. Though the title To Kill a Mocking Bird has very little to do with the story, Harper Lee has made it so it has symbolic weight. Throughout the course of the novel the innocence of Maycomb is destroyed by prejudice from its citizens. The idea of the mocking bird is to represent the innocence of the town, Atticus tells the children that to kill a mocking bird is a sin "Shoot all the…show more content…
. . sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.” Clarifying that to kill the mocking bird is to not only destroy ones own innocence but innocence in general. Throughout the story there are two main characters that can be described as mocking birds, these are Tom Robinson and Arthur (Boo) Radley, as neither of these characters have a voice within the town so therefore others opinions of them have been constructed by judgment and prejudice. The connection between the novel’s title and this symbol can be seen clearly throughout the duration of the novel: after Tom Robinson’s death, Mr Underwood (editor of the Maycomb Tribune ) compares the shooting to the “senseless slaughter of song bird”. At the end of the story Scout thinks that the hurting of Boo would be like “shootin’ a mockingbird”. As mentioned before Atticus tells the children that they can shoot all the Blue jays they want, Blue jays in the novel are pests and can also be seen as symbolic of those that stand with a…show more content…
To Kill a Mockingbird is almost set in two perspectives; Jean-Louise as the first person narrator but also as participant in the story (Scout). We as the reader see the story evolve not only from a child’s viewpoint but also the mature, adult perspective, offering the benefit of hindsight and reflection. The insightful, adult narration by Jean-Louise successfully contrasts with the point of view, wit and humour expressed by the young Scout. For the most part, Jean-Louise gives us the events from her childhood perspective, as she understood them at the time, rather than in an adult explanation. This makes the narrative perspective naïve: “I watched our absolute morphidite go black and crumble;” (page 67) Often we get descriptions of the events just as she experienced them, without commentary on what they actually
Open Document