Should Citizens Be Allowed To Vote In Canada

1859 Words8 Pages
Canada and the United States are two of the most diverse countries due to the large amount of immigrants accepted yearly. With the amount of immigrants accepted into Canada, there is a question if they should be allowed to vote as non-citizens. In most countries, having the right to vote is given to individuals who have citizenship in that particular country. However, in some places within different countries, they allow non-citizens who are permanent residents to vote in local elections, but in Canada individuals must be citizens to vote. There is only a small fraction of cases where non-citizens are allowed to vote at the national level. In Canada, an individual has to be a permanent resident for at least three years to be eligible to apply…show more content…
Irene Bloemraad’s article examines that when immigrants in Canada are compared to immigrants in the United States, Canada has a higher chance of naturalization. He observes that a large percentage of immigrants will become citizens. In 1991, around 73% of Canadian immigrants naturalized where the US only had 43 percent. Reasons for the naturalization gap could be due to Canada having faster processes to become citizens, they naturalize earlier, have higher numbers and Canada also allows immigrants to have dual citizenships. Another reason might be due to that Canada likes to choose immigrants who have a high chance of naturalization. Bloemraad’s paper studied Massachusetts and Ontario’s Portuguese immigrants and looks at data to prove the naturalization gap. He found that they both have similarities and the gap is largely from the relationship between immigrant organizations and the state (Bloemraad, 2002). The length of time for immigrants to become citizens is increasing from three to ten years. In that time immigrants are losing out on important issues that are affecting them and they should be able to voice their opinions (Bloemraad, 2002; Cole, 2013 & Mah, 2013). This information shows that a large percentage of Canada’s immigrants decide to become citizens, therefore if most immigrants are deciding to stay in Canada and to become a citizen is becoming longer, permanent…show more content…
Allowing immigrants to vote before they are educated may produce unfairness and reducing the quality of public policies; therefore suggest that integration must happen before participation (Eisenberg, 2014). Though Munro argued this by writing if non-citizens are allowed to vote it might get non-citizens to work hard to study and educate their selves about democracies and how they work in the community they want to live in; thus integration has a higher chance of happening if non-citizens participate (Munro, 2008). One can argue and find flaws in any issue, but overall out of all the negative factors to allow permanent non-citizens to vote the positive factors overpower the negative
Open Document