MMR Vaccination

678 Words3 Pages
Introduction, Body, Conclusion The paper I was assigned to review was about MMR vaccination and the controversial part was referred to the fact some people do not agree to give their children vaccinated because of the chance of getting Autism. When I started reading, I had no idea what was the topic about. Is it a different look to MMR like molecular side or the fact how it developed and at the middle of the paper, I finally realized it is about whether or not vaccination is really correlated with Autism or this is just a myth? Technically, this paper start with an introduction, then history, then discussion then the result and conclusion, but officially you couldn’t tell them apart at the first sight. I am telling right now, and I will tell later, this paper has an absence of titling and it was more like a report than a paper to me. A very good report though. Style:…show more content…
It was first from history, then from what MMR and then about what is autism and then suddenly what people think and at the second time you are thinking that it is good that everything are hierarchical behind each other, but I think the paper should be partitioned. Each part has to have their own title and at the first part there should be an objective. Something that helps you to realize what this paper is about. I am not just talking about the whole paper heading which there should be one and I know the writer planned to have a real paper, but unfortunately not the first draft. But in every two or more paragraphs which are related such as History of vaccination, MMR structure and function, how autism is related to MMR. Who is supporting this myth? These are good (not perfect) title that can help the reader be prepared for what is going to read in a few seconds later. Grammar and

More about MMR Vaccination

Open Document