Inequality In India

984 Words4 Pages
A.POWER DISTANCE: Power Distance is defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of organisations within a country expect and receive that power is spread unequally. This dimension deals that all persons in societies are not equal – it shows the attitude of the culture towards inequalities within us. If one has to describe the Indian attitude, one can use the following phrases: acceptance of un-equal rights between the power-privileged, dependent on the power captured person for direction, materialistic leader, superiors can accessible but one layer above less so, management directs and gives reason to ones work life and get rewards in terms of loyalty from employees. India scores higher on the dimension, 77, indicating that…show more content…
India scores 56, on this dimension and is shown the Masculine society. The designer brand label, the materialistic things and showiness that goes with one’s success, is widely practiced. D. UNCERTAINITY AVOIDANCE: This dimension has to do with the way that the society dealing with the fact that the future will never be known: shall we try to control the future or just let it be happened? The extent to which the members of a culture feel intimidated by unknown situations and have created beliefs and institutions that try to avoid these is reflected in the score on this dimension. This confusion brings with it anxiety and different cultures have learnt to manage with this anxiety in different ways. In India, acceptance of imperfection is there; nothing can to neither be perfect nor can to go exactly as planned. India scores 40, on this dimension and thus India has a medium preference for avoiding unexceptancy. India is traditionally a patient country where tolerance for the uncertainty is high. Rules are often in place just to be avoided and one keeps faith on innovative methods to ‘bypass the system’. . People generally do not feel stimulated and compelled to take action-initiatives and comfortably settle into established routines and roles without…show more content…
LONG TERM ORIENTATION: This dimension shows how every society has to manage some links with its own past while dealing with the challenges of the present and the future, and societies give priorities to these two goals differently. Normative societies, which score low on this dimension, prefer to maintain time-honoured traditions and norms while seeing societal change with distrusting. Those with a culture which scores high, on the other hand, take a more realistic approach: they encourage miserliness and efforts in modern education as the way to ready for the future. In India, the concept of ‘karma’ influences religious and philosophical beliefs. With a medium score of 51 in this dimension, a influencing preference in Indian culture cannot be determined Countries like India have the great tolerance for religion and spiritual views from all over the world. Societies that have a high score on sensibility, typically forgive a lack of punctuality. In India there is an acceptability that there are so many truths and often depends on the acceptor. F.

More about Inequality In India

Open Document