A SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF HENRI FAYOL Henri Fayol was born in İstanbul in 1841. Fayol’s father was an engineer who is appointed as a supervisor fort he construction of Galata Bridge located in İstanbul. He and his family returned to France in 1847. Henri Fayol studied mining engineering at the ‘École Nationale Superieure des Mines’ academy in Saint-Étienne. At the age of 19 he started to his career as mine engineer. In 1888 he became a manager who employs over 1000 people. Henri Fayol was also one of
Marie Curie, the most famous scientist was born on the 7th November 1876 in Warsaw, Poland. Her parents were both teachers and also wanted their kids to be educated even though it was hard for girls in Poland to attend school. This was because Poland at that time was ruled by the Russians. Marie and her siblings were not allowed to attend school or read and write in polish. She was also the youngest child of 5 children. Marie was known to be the brightest child in the family. Marie wanted to attend
The (joy of life) and Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon can be simultaneously seen as inspired by and breaking free of Paul Cézanne’s, because the joy of life It is a large-scale painting that has a brilliant colored forest which has been depicting an Arcadian landscape filled with, meadow, sea, and sky and populated by nude figures both at rest and in motion while Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon has sensual eroticism with these kinds of aggressively crude pornography that has a landscape
. According to Greg Lynn, writer of “Folding in Architecture”, Deleuze’s concept of the fold is of exact prominence for this analysis of the “addition of alterations within a continuous yet heterogeneous system” for it offers “a theory of synthesis and unity that maintains detail as a discrete moment that participates intensively in the construction of a new kind of whole”-Lynn. Furthermore, according to architectural theorist John Rajchman in his thesis “Out of the Fold” from Folding in architecture
Weeks in her journal ‘the value of differences’ argues that when a group of people have a common belonging that differentiates them from the others, it will give them a sense of social identities (88). Furthermore, Henri Tajfel and John Turner supported that statement by indicating the social identity as “the labeling of ones’ self as a member of the group” (2). In comparison with individual identity; which focuses on the interpersonal relationship, the members of
9. Centralisation : Fayol believed in centralisation. He, however, did not contemplate concentration of all decision making authority in the top management. He, however, held that centralisation and decentralisation is a question of proportion. In a small firm with a limited number of employees, the owner-manager can give orders directly to everyone. In large organizations, however, where the worker is separated from the chief executive through a long scalar chain, the decision making authority
In his book The Four Agreements, Miguel Ruiz states: “The human mind is like a fertile ground where seeds are continually being planted. The seeds are opinions, ideas, and concepts. You plant the seed of thought, and it grows” (28) I believe that his statement is undoubtedly true. By not following the third agreement don’t take anything personally you are creating personal poison to affect other peoples’ life in a negative way. “Whatever happens around you, don’t take it personally” (Ruiz 47). Ruiz’s
Political participation, and to what extent an individual may take part in legislation, is a matter of opinion. In each of their texts, Edmund Burke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, each discussed, extensively, the political and social provisions of civil life, and who shall have the right to participate in politics. Each writer has his own terms regarding political participation, and among all three there are resemblances as frequent as there are contraries when it comes to who should
Hannah Arendt, who is the author of the book named "On Revolution", explained the relationship between power and liberty with the explanations of other phenomena and terms. She demonstrated the American and French Revolutions in order to clarify her opinions. Before explaining the relationship between power and liberty from Arendt's point of view, firstly we should glance at the meanings of power and liberty separately, according to Hannah Arendt. Hannah Arendt says that power is the capacity to
“Tolerance should be given to all religions that tolerate others” (Rousseau 73). And, “no opinions contrary… to those moral rules that are necessary to the preservation of civil society should be tolerated” (Locke 20). John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were philosophers of the Great Enlightenment period; both scholars lived in an age that promised societal transformation through reason and newly arising scientific discovery, both sought to shape just and tolerant human societies, and both made