The Second Amendment: The Right To Bear Arms

1217 Words5 Pages
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states , “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports. In contrast, Opponents believe that arms should have regulations because they cause violence, such as mass shootings and murder. Despite the differences of each side, the second amendment aids in protection of all individual rights to keep and bear arms for self defense when necessary. As a result, the definition of the right to bear arms has to be provided. The second…show more content…
The second amendment refers to the individual right of the people to keep and bear arms without the scare of that right being taken away. The second amendment reserves the right of the people to protect themselves and their families from criminals. In Summary, those in favor of the second amendment argue that firearms are used for self protection against criminals and in sports including trapshooting and hunting. In contrast, opponents of the second amendment demand for strict gun regulations in order to decrease gun violence. Although, opponents believe that strict gun regulations should be enforced it isn’t the answer towards the decrease in gun violence. Without armed citizens, gun violence would increase because criminals would know that no-one can stop them from doing crimes except for the law. The second amendment is a symbol of the citizens within the United States for protection against tyranny and criminals. Although the controversy will never end in America the individual right to bear arms will never change by the state or federal
Open Document