The atomic bomb being dropped on Japan is a very controversial topic. many people believed it was a harsh decision on the US's part. On the other hand, even more believe it was necessary to do it. Another effect was the recolonization of war. The pros and cons are very high. In my opinion the use of the atomic bomb was necessary for the US to use. It helped the war end faster along with fewer US casualties. Many people were upset with the thousands of Japanese citizens that died, however
The atomic bomb is a series of two bombs that the Americans dropped on Japan in August of 1945. During this period of time Truman was president of the United States. The United States along with many other parts of the world were going through World War II, and the bombs are what the Americans hoped would force the Japanese to surrender, in which they did. Two bombs were dropped from a plane, “Enola Gay,” during a three day period; one bomb was named “Little Boy” and the other named “Fat Man.”
On August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was dropped by the United States in the city of Hiroshima, Japan (population of approximately 284,000 and 43,000 soldiers), instantly vaporizing and killing some 70,000 people instantly. Three days later, on August 9, a second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki (population of approximately 195,000 citizens), where roughly 35,600 people were immediately killed by the blast, flames, and collapsing buildings, all according to the Encyclopedia of
not the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally acceptable. There is evidence that creates arguments for both sides. To fully understand whether the dropping of the atomic bombs was morally correct, it is important to look at the events that led up to dropping the bombs as well as the events after. I believe that it was morally correct to drop the first atomic bomb, Little Boy, on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945; I do not believe that dropping the second atomic bomb, Fat Man, on Nagasaki
Truman to use atomic weapons on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was no different. Did the U.S. absolutely need to engage in nuclear warfare? Was it morally right to bomb civilians? Did the U.S. ignore jus in bello? Many historians have differentiating views regarding the use of atomic weapons, some arguing that the atomic bombs ended the war while others maintain that the bombings only accelerated Japan’s defeat, which many viewed an an inevitable outcome. The use of atomic weapons on
conducted numerous atomic bomb tests on several small atolls in the Pacific (Coakley, pg. 523). A site could’ve easily been prepared in 1945. If representatives of the Japanese government and or military, could have seen the bomb, it might have been enough to convince them to surrender. If it did not work, the U.S. would state that they tried to warn the Japanese, and some justification would having been given. However, if the Japanese had agreed to a demonstration and the bomb didn’t work, it could’ve
The atomic bomb, one of the most toxic and fatal weapons ever invented, was dropped on Hiroshima on the 6th of August 1945, and then again on Nagasaki three days later. It was dropped by the Americans who were against the Japanese in World War II. Although it ended the war I still believe the Americans should not have dropped the bomb. At least not when they did. The Americans chose to drop the bomb so that they could end the war and save up to one million American soldiers’ lives. “We have used
discovered that uranium produced radiation, and nuclear fission was finally discovered in 1938 by Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann1. Because of this, and Albert Einstein's equation (E=MC²), people were able to make the first atomic bomb. In 1945, Hiroshima was destroyed with one of these bombs, which only contained a ball of uranium the size of a basketball. After WWll, scientists thought of how to utilize uranium and made the first ever nuclear reactor in 1950. They decided to store all of the waste beneath
Adolf Hitler was not only known as a “bad man” and a “devil.” But the truth is, he was a man with emotions, that he didn't look deeply in. His intention was never to kill, his guilt and depression overpowered him to commit suicide. but he did have pro and cons of his leadership. Adolf Hitler had charisma and great leadership qualities, the information he was supporting was bringing sorrow and resentful actions. Many citizens hate Hitler for what he had done, nevertheless they should like what he did