The Aeschylus: The Oresteia

1548 Words7 Pages
Aeschylus: The Oresteia is a brief analysis by Simon Goldhill of the famous Greek trilogy. In it, Goldhill connects the intricacies of Greek society to tragedy, explaining the impacts of politics and culture on Aeschylus’s work for the purpose of giving students and professors alike a deeper understanding of the series. He states that the goal of this book is to give in-depth analyses of certain key sections of the Oresteia so as to show the complexity of Aeschylus’s work. Goldhill focuses on specific cultural and plot-enhancing topics that, through his explanations, not only lay the basis for the readers’ understanding of Greek society but reveal multiple layers to the characters’ driving functions. It should be noted that Goldhill is a professor…show more content…
Goldhill relates many driving factors in the Oresteia back to the polis. He also includes background knowledge of Greek democracy, festivals, and theater tradition so that readers have a succinct understanding of Greek culture before delving into his analysis. This information is truly valuable later on, when Goldhill is explaining the societal values and norms that are played against each other in the tragedy. In the second part of the book, where Goldhill begins his true analysis, he introduces the readers to the ironic predicament known as the “double bind,” which plays a key role…show more content…
He does not give as detailed explanations on the subjects of the later chapters, which include his suggestion of the parallels between Homer and Aeschylus, and his discussion on the technicalities of language and writing in the Oresteia. This information is almost overwhelmed by Goldhill’s main analyses, but should not be taken for granted. Polis, oikos, and dikē are the three Greek words that Goldhill circulates throughout his analysis. He uses them to explain not only how they fluctuate the meaning of a word or sentence, but also how the meanings of the words themselves are interwoven with the story. Polis, as described above, is the heart of all things political, and is used by Goldhill to explain duty and order within Greek family, society, and law. “Oikos” is the Greek household, and the status of it. These Greek terms do not have a singular meaning as most English words do – rather, the three terms that Goldhill draws attention to each represent a multitude of meanings that revolve around one main idea. Dikē, the final term, is used to express justice, punishment, or retribution. Goldhill explains how the concept of each word plays a role in the trilogy. It is difficult to summarily explain the relevance of each one, as Goldhill
Open Document