Then imagine biting into a terrible tasting dry sandwich, one that sticks to your throat as you regretfully swallow it. I think everybody can agree that the school food, in most cases, is very bad tasting and can be unhealthy. My response to this problem is open campus lunches. Open campus provide many things that you just can’t get at school. Some include, but are not limited to, healthier food choices, better food choices, a chance to just relax and gather your thoughts on the upcoming class. A
Breyden Coates Persausive Paper Are you tired of having the same school lunches over and over? Are you fed up with school lunch food that doesn’t even taste like it should? If you are, then you and I agree that school lunches are not worth staying at school to eat, and high school students should be allowed to leave campus during lunch periods. Many schools dont believe allowing high school students to leave campus during school lunch time is a good idea. They claim that kids may not return
Most schools claim to have a more nutritional meal for kids, but truly they are serving the same types of food you can find at a regular fast food restaurant. Students should be allowed to leave school for lunch because it allows them to not only practice responsibility, but it also gives them a wider variety of food, and freedom Not only do the meals taste unappetizing at school, but some are also more expensive than something you can buy at a fast food restaurant. High school students will be
lunch policy allows students to take their minds off school work for at least 30 minutes. As stated in a blog on Connect Us, “Open campus lunch allows students to leave the school campus on a break to have lunch outside” (Connect US, 2015). Most students who work on their school work hours in a day, work, attend athletic practice, and, aside from all this, have family events to attend or enjoy having some free time. Not everyone works hard for their future, but those who do should be rewarded with an
Verdict Though I concede the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was instrumental to the development of the Civil Rights Movement and essential to the new legislation being passed, I still insist that Brown has yet to achieve its intended purpose of school desegregation. Furthermore, I am not sure it is entirely possible to claim that Brown is either a success or failure, whereas it makes more to describe it as having its strengths and weaknesses. In the report Brown at 50: King’s Dream or Plessy’s