School Expenditure Survey

817 Words4 Pages
C. THE ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES OF PARENTS One of the focal explanations for dropping out of school is the expensive price of education. The Family Income and Expenditure Survey exposed that education is not a priority among poor families as wholesale of their expenditures goes to food (60%). In the said year, only 1.2% of the household budget is disbursed for education. This means the government does not give any attention on education. Critics appealed that though K to 12 will be given free by the government in public schools where most of the unfortunate enroll in, parents will still have out-of-pocket outlays to cover their schoolchildren’s food, transportation and allowance. Addition of two more years of high school would consequently…show more content…
Critics opposed though that increasing the school exit age would be predominantly disapproving to the unfortunate who, in general, desire to finish high school in the shortest period probable so that they can assist their families right away. Adding two extra years of senior high would further postpone their admission into the employment market and result in foregone wages from labor. They also add up that increasing the school exit age would not also be an absolute benefit even if students graduate at 18 because industries still choose college graduates over fresh graduates from high…show more content…
THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS The Department Education appealed that a 12-year basic education cycle will permit each graduate to be biddable with international standards such as the Washington and Bologna Accords. Critics supported though that while it is vital to comply with standards, authentic involvement disclosed that foreign proprietors look chiefly at competencies and not at the number of years of schooling when hiring employees. Filipino engineers, nurses, teachers, accountants, etc. get employed as professionals regardless of the modification in the mandatory years of schooling overseas. Opponents also highlighted that not all graduates will study or work abroad and only those who will be affected by the non-standardized cycles should be the ones to bear the consequences. The rest should be spared from undertaking a system of education that will not really profit them. Instead of changing the whole basic education cycle, a suitable system of assessment and training could be undertaken for those who desire to study or be employed out of the

More about School Expenditure Survey

Open Document