Apology was written by pupil Plato as he watched his teacher, and in some ways hero, stand before the jury with two harsh charges pending against him. As Socrates taught Plato, Plato learned many of his ways was there to document this trial. While there is speculation on how true the words of Plato were in the work of Apology, it is thought that because of how much Plato admirers Socrates that the words are probably a fairly accurate account. These charges brought against Socrates were that of corrupting
The Legend of Socrates Socrates was a philological teacher; only he do not consider himself to be one, he believe in virtue and wisdom. His only activity is to go around his city and enlighten people around him about the virtue of one’s soul and prove that one is not as wise as they think to themselves to be, but knows nothing about what they claim. The legend of Socrates begin through the eyes of Plato, Xenophon, and Aristophanes; whom continues the surviving tales of Socrates teachings. Each
By all means, The Apology by Plato is a remarkable demonstration of philosophical inquiry. It illustrates how logic and reason have the ability to persuade and challenge personal notions and held beliefs. However, when one approaches this book from a different direction, The Apology by Plato is a great example of the homonymous meaning and this can be seen in the word conviction. To better realize the dualistic connotations of the word conviction, one must first be aware of the two definitions
Socrates claims in Plato’s Crito that “the most important thing is not life, but the good life” (48b). He issued this statement while responding to Crito when he suggested to him that he should escape and go into exile instead of allowing the law to prosecute him for what he did not do. Socrates wanted Crito to understand that he was not ready to break the laws of Athens. Because the Laws existed as a single entity, to break one of them simply meant to break all of them which means that if he agreed
An Account of the Trial of Socrates as outlined in Plato’s Apology This essay is an interpretation of the accusations against Socrates during his trial. Socrates was a Greek philosopher born in 470 BCE. He believed that within philosophical thought was the value of human knowledge. He would rather die than live not being allowed to express his ideas of wisdom and improvement of the soul. In 431BCE, democratic Athens was the political and cultural centre of the period, the Spartans saw its development
fundamental contradiction that arises in the two dialogues by Socrates; Crito and Apology by Plato. In the Apology we get to meet the defiant Socrates who declares during his trial that he would not stop practicing philosophy in contradiction to the jury’s order if he was to be acquitted on condition never to practice philosophy ever again. Socrates claimed that he would choose to obey the gods as long as he was alive instead of obeying men. Here Socrates can be seen to present a defiant argument for disobedience
In Crito Socrates emphasized that the most important thing for a human being was not just mere life, but good life. In this case, by good life, he did not mean having a lot of wealth, money and children and participating in political clubs or government offices, but living a just life that ensures justice to others and to oneself (Crito 53). When he is brought on trial for the charges of corrupting the youth, not worshipping the city’s gods and “inventing” his own gods, Socrates places emphasis on
“The Apology”, is Plato recalling and interpreting the Trial of Socrates, which occurred in 399 B.C. In the dialogue, Socrates explains where he has come from, and who he is as a person. When translated in english, the title “The Apology”, is a misnomer, due to the fact that Socrates does not apologize, but only makes an effort to defend himself and his actions. In Greek, the word “Apology” derives from the Greek word "apologia”, which translates to “defense”, which perfectly relates to the title
However, the most spectacular of the speeches on love comes from Socrates who pulls bits from the others’ dialogues and subtly incorporates them into his own to create the broad definition of love, encompassing both the love of wisdom and the love of various forms of beauty. His speech also serves as a defense in Plato’s Apology, where many concepts presented in the Symposium directly contend the charges laid against him on trial. Both works impressively present highly philosophical ideas in the
particular who I want to talk about. I am talking about Socrates, Socrates was a Greek philosopher of Athens(469-399 B.C.) Socrates was considered the wisest man. In his old age Socrates start being more present in things happening in Athens. Socrates talked to young about what he believed, he make them more wise and teach them for the better. However there was some powerful people who was affected by this so Socrates was wanted dead. Socrates was not guilty because he never said he was an atheist