Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing? Animals should not be used for scientific and commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals don't make good test subjects, and testing on animals is more expensive. ADD MORE. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. During the process, some animals are forcefully fed, and some aren’t even fed at all. Some don’t even get water. If testing on monkeys, mice, and bunnies is ok then is it ok to test on household pets
idea of testing on animals has been around for a long time, the modern controversy sparked in the late 1900’s with the Animal Welfare Act and the debate that followed it. Some may say that it is absurd to think that animals should have similar rights as humans, but opponents argue that animals simply look differently than humans, and should not be denied of their rights because of physical differences. They still have feelings and a sense of fear and community. Supporters also claim that animal testing
According to “Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”, an estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States alone for scientific and commercial testing. On the surface, this testing has been used to develop new medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications and check the safety of products destined for human use. Research on living animals has been taking place since at least 500 BC. (“Animal Testing”,) There is currently no alternative method
United States alone an estimated 26 million animals are used annually for commercial and scientific use. Animals are being used to develop cosmetic products, medical treatments, biomedical researches, and used to check if a product is safe to be used by humans. Animal testing around the world should be banned because it is cruel towards the animals and causing extinction of different species. Animal testing, a scientific experiment performed on live animals that have to endure pain, suffering, and
Ban Animal Testing Dr. Richard Klausner, a former director of the National Cancer Institute, once said, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (Cimons M.). In this statement, Klausner is pointing out a serious flaw in animal testing by stating curing cancer in mice has been done but yet humans still have to face cancer. Mice are not the only animals being used to find cures in
We Shouldn’t do Animal Testing Every day animals are being tested and harmed in so many different ways. Some of those ways include, abusive owners, animals with no homes (stray animals), and animal testing. I believe that all of these are bad, but I especially believe that animal testing is the worst. Now, some people think that animal testing is good because it helps ensure the safety of drugs, a lot of veterinary research relies on the use of animal research, and the venom of snakes being tested
metal cage for the night. This is the everyday life of animal test subjects. With animal activist and animal welfare acts (AWA) in place it is hard to believe there is
Safety Tests On Commercial GM Crops GM Tomatoes For the production of GM tomatoes , a tomato was being incorporated by kanr genes by an ‘antisense’ GM method (IRDC 1998). According to the results no sententious modifications were show in contents of total protein, vitamins and mineral even in toxic glycoalkaloids (Redenbaugh et al. 1992). As a result, the parent tomatoes were considered to be signifiantly equivalent. No toxic effects were noticed in the modified GM tomatoes in case of acute
whether we should modify our genetic code for our benefit proves to be a difficult one. The novel Flowers for Algernon tries to show the effects such an experiment might have. In Flowers for Algernon, Keyes does not support the experiment that alters Charlie’s intelligence, by emphasizing Charlie’s inability to properly associate with others, and by pointing out the moral issues the scientists. Although Keyes disagrees with the tampering of humans, I personally believe that we should try to use biology