Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing? Animals should not be used for scientific and commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals don't make good test subjects, and testing on animals is more expensive. ADD MORE. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. During the process, some animals are forcefully fed, and some aren’t even fed at all. Some don’t even get water. If testing on monkeys, mice, and bunnies is ok then is it ok to test on household pets
idea of testing on animals has been around for a long time, the modern controversy sparked in the late 1900’s with the Animal Welfare Act and the debate that followed it. Some may say that it is absurd to think that animals should have similar rights as humans, but opponents argue that animals simply look differently than humans, and should not be denied of their rights because of physical differences. They still have feelings and a sense of fear and community. Supporters also claim that animal testing
United States alone an estimated 26 million animals are used annually for commercial and scientific use. Animals are being used to develop cosmetic products, medical treatments, biomedical researches, and used to check if a product is safe to be used by humans. Animal testing around the world should be banned because it is cruel towards the animals and causing extinction of different species. Animal testing, a scientific experiment performed on live animals that have to endure pain, suffering, and
We Shouldn’t do Animal Testing Every day animals are being tested and harmed in so many different ways. Some of those ways include, abusive owners, animals with no homes (stray animals), and animal testing. I believe that all of these are bad, but I especially believe that animal testing is the worst. Now, some people think that animal testing is good because it helps ensure the safety of drugs, a lot of veterinary research relies on the use of animal research, and the venom of snakes being tested
Safety Tests On Commercial GM Crops GM Tomatoes For the production of GM tomatoes , a tomato was being incorporated by kanr genes by an ‘antisense’ GM method (IRDC 1998). According to the results no sententious modifications were show in contents of total protein, vitamins and mineral even in toxic glycoalkaloids (Redenbaugh et al. 1992). As a result, the parent tomatoes were considered to be signifiantly equivalent. No toxic effects were noticed in the modified GM tomatoes in case of acute