knowledge questions, I interpreted them as any other question, I thought they were similar those we answer in other subjects. As the quarters passed by, I realized how the knowledge questions were different questions, solely based on knowledge and how one question could have multiple answers to it because every individual has a different perspective and approach to the topic. For instance, we began the year learning about conspiracy theories, I feel with the help of knowledge questions, I learnt
destitution affect the intelligence of a child? Apart from the previous question, what is the meaning of the author’s content and intent of the article. Plus, where did Diana Kwon acquire her research? There are a numerous amount of questions this article. Ergo,what is the writer’s content in the article mean? The article’s subject matter states that children in poverty are affected by poverty. Consequently, this is a rhetorical question. Diana’s article tries to convince the reader that poverty affects
setting. Due to the lack of business and color, the viewer is forced to focus in on the the bright green apple. As a result, one is tempted to ask, “What is behind the apple?” even though the question is impossible to answer, and that is exactly the point. René Magritte uses this fruit of temptation to lure his audience into asking such questions, thus creating a conversation
believe that Jackson is trying to convey the message that people should question authority. In the story, the villages go along every year participating in the lottery because it is a tradition that has taken place for so long that it seems normal to them; no one bothers to question it. They go along with what whoever is in charge of the lottery at the time tells them to do with no questions asked. If the villagers would begin to question the lottery they would realize that what they are doing is inhumane
technology, especially new media, making the society question how politics will be practiced. The possible disconnection between politicians and some part of the society as for example the elderly of people without access to the Internet is a matter of concern for the modern democracies. Politicians are most of the time behind the screen of a TV, a computer or a mobile phone, a tendency that threats to destroy the essence of elections. Consequently, the question that remains is if politics will modify its
intelligent beings having the same thoughts and feelings that we do. The very thought of thinking, and by extension, artificial thinking is certainly an idea wrought full of irony; this begs the question, is artificial intelligence going too far? Would the program be able to learn, feel, think, and question as we, humans are able to? Would it even be morally or ethically correct to imbue a program with this ability? With so many
instead make the Romans question the truth behind Caesar’s so-mentioned ambitious flaw. Simply put, Brutus does not use much figurative language and by relying on cold hard evidence that only relates to his person, his oration is easily deconstructed by Antony. However, Brutus does try to phrase a rhetorical device in which he asks the public at the beginning of his presentation, “who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?” (III.ii.30). Despite his attempt at a rhetorical question, Brutus instead divides
of education”. It talks about certain prisoners, who are chained in an underground cave. They cannot move their body and heads. They all are forced to sit in a single position and look at the wall. Behind them is a fire, where gives them light. They can only see shadows of the objects moving behind them. According to Plato, shadows of those objects are as close as they can get to reality. For the prisoners, the shadows is the reality and they can never form an impression about the real object
feeling to go and do everything as fast as possible for not any real reason. The song calls for people to think about why society is scurrying all across the country. The lines “ Don’t know why I have to drive so fast, My car has nothing to prove” questions why people rush in their cars. The next line “ it can go 0 to 60 in 5.2.” follows the questioning by showing how ingrained speed is in
In Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, there is a heavy tie to the Socratic method, which consists of a deep theoretical question that is answered, and then the answer is asked another theoretical question. The connection between the Narrator and Ishmael consists of Socratic dialogue. This dialogue intends to draw information from a subject, and scrutinize the information obtained. There is also usage of the Socratic Method demonstrated in the Ted Talk: Philosophy in Prison. In the case of Philosophy in Prison