Does the Second Amendment need amending? Does the second amendment need to be amended? The answer is yes. While the controversy of gun control is hard to fix it is not impossible. Why do away with the second amendment if we the people can just amend it again. We are a democracy and we thrive on interpreting and amending things that need changed and compromising so why not do the same to the second amendment. Three key points that will help you understand this view on the second amendment are the
The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791. It allows American citizens to bear arms. We are talking about this issue because of what happened to Parkland shooting. To this day, one of the top deadliest shooting that occurred here in the States, a 19- year old had access to AR-15. He managed to kill 17 innocent students and faculty and left the entire school leave with a traumatic experience that one will never forget. There are two sides of where this begins and creates a controversial
2nd Amendment Legislation There are many pros and cons that arise because of the right given to us by the 2nd amendment. In my opinion, the pros outweigh the cons and that people should be able to carry concealed weapons, as long as they have their concealed handguns license. Specifically, the 2nd amendment reads “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The important thing that should be noted
It was James Madison who formerly solicited The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution in which it was confirmed in December 1791, and the amendment reads, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (livescience.com/26485-second-amendment.). This amendment was confirmed and written to avert the English and was given the citizens the power to fight back. Consequently, violent crimes
with Eighth Amendment involving cruel and unusual punishment. In Madrid v. Gomez a suit filed by prisoners of Pelican Bay state prison stated that; violations including excessive force, inadequate physical and mental health and, and inhumane conditions in the prison’s Secure Housing Unit. (SolitaryWatch) The court in this case ruled in favor of the State stating that; the degree of psychological trauma inflicted on the average prisoner is not enough by itself to create an Eight Amendment violation
The Right to Bear Arms: Its Pros and Cons The “Right to Bear Arms” is the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution, which became a law collectively with the 9 amendments composing the Bill of Rights. The commandment it holds states that “Well governed armed forces, which are vital to provide security and protection to the independent State, shall not disobey the natural right of a person to bear arms,” proclaiming the militias to recognize completely citizens’ rights. While there are benefits
government’s hand in controlling firearms. While many people use emotion to back up their pro-control argument say it will save lives, others use statistics about shootings, violent crime involving guns, and self-defense to defend their claim. More gun control in the United States would not be effective because: it would create a larger black market, it would disarm law-abiding citizens, it would violate the second
a day are killed by guns in America? Since December 15, 1791 the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In the past decade gun control has been a huge issue the USA, with many people supporting the right to own fire arms but another big group wanting to make the ownership of fire arms illegal. The dispute has many pros and cons, but if we take a long look to the pros of making fire arms illegal we will realize how big it will affect
kidnapping, robbery, and residential burglary. In accordance to the provisions of the law, it states offenders obtaining one previous strike offense lose eligibility for probation, and sentencing is double the usual punishment upon conviction of any second felony. Offenders gaining two prior strike offenses also lose eligibility for probation, and must be sentenced upon conviction of any third
In order and to discuss the pros and cons of both written and unwritten constitutions, we must first define the terminology used. While the ‘written’ and ‘unwritten’ constitutions seem easily distinguishable based on their descriptions, it is important to note that often times an unwritten constitution simply means that the laws of the state are not compiled into one original document. An unwritten constitution is generally the result of historical development. It was never made by a representative