The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791. It allows American citizens to bear arms. We are talking about this issue because of what happened to Parkland shooting. To this day, one of the top deadliest shooting that occurred here in the States, a 19- year old had access to AR-15. He managed to kill 17 innocent students and faculty and left the entire school leave with a traumatic experience that one will never forget. There are two sides of where this begins and creates a controversial
It was James Madison who formerly solicited The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution in which it was confirmed in December 1791, and the amendment reads, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (livescience.com/26485-second-amendment.). This amendment was confirmed and written to avert the English and was given the citizens the power to fight back. Consequently, violent crimes
government’s hand in controlling firearms. While many people use emotion to back up their pro-control argument say it will save lives, others use statistics about shootings, violent crime involving guns, and self-defense to defend their claim. More gun control in the United States would not be effective because: it would create a larger black market, it would disarm law-abiding citizens, it would violate the second
a day are killed by guns in America? Since December 15, 1791 the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In the past decade gun control has been a huge issue the USA, with many people supporting the right to own fire arms but another big group wanting to make the ownership of fire arms illegal. The dispute has many pros and cons, but if we take a long look to the pros of making fire arms illegal we will realize how big it will affect
Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge the pros and cons of defunding abortion clinics throughout America. Limiting funding to Planned Parenthood would affect millions of women, not just women seeking abortions. As Frost, Frohwirth, and Purcell (2004) note, “sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment;
For many years the topic of school uniforms have been tossed around over and over with what seems like no clear answer to the question. Are school uniforms necessary? Are student rights being denied? Do uniforms really impact student daily school lives? School uniforms should not be enforced because, they are unnecessary deny the rights of students’ freedom of expression, and have little to no effect on the lives of the students. School uniforms prevent students from participating in gang related
1. The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Philippines – What can be expected and what are the trends that would shape CSR in our country for the next ten years. Due to the slow growth of the Philippine economy, Corporate Social Responsibility was being implemented and practiced by the corporations. It is based on the Philanthropic stage or what we call “kawang gawa”. Philippine CSR practices are generally manifested through donations or gratuitous activities and the public views
addressed to members of the public at a large scale, then it is likely to be one of strict liability. Strict liability is subject to a lively debate by the doctrine. There are a number of arguments both in favour of strict liability and against it. Pros: - Protection of the public: strict liability raises standards where the health and safety of the public is at stake and forces those in a position of responsibility to take extra precautions. - Promoting enforcement of the law: strict liability does
arbitration by showing that domestic and international law can harmoniously coexist in the age of globalization. This article is relevant for my research because I also see the same problem as there are a lot of forums, each one having its own pros and cons but which should be followed remains unsolved. ICSID proceedings are more transparent as compared to the UNCITRAL proceedings but for appeal against awards, UNCITRAL allows for it but ICSID makes it binding. So which forum should be followed remains