Nepal has a cultural and tradition of informal community based co-operatives including savings and credit associations popularly known as dhikuti, and grain savings and labour savings systems known as parma and dharma bhakari. Similarly, Guthi provided a forum to work together for smoothly running different socio cultural practices. Many of these traditional systems of cooperation are still functioning in some rural areas of Nepal. Year 1950, in the political history of Nepal because 103 years long
an indigenous people who are predominately dependent on natural resources (Amin, 2015; West, 2006; Wells 1995). In the context of Nepal, the notion of biodiversity conservation held constraining perspective on the protection of flora and fauna. Therefore, several conflicts between park – people in protected areas are presented in literature case studies of Nepal (Nepal, 1992; Limbu, 2003; Pant 2012; Gyawali, 1989; Upreti, 1985; Silwal 2013). The formulation of National Park and Wildlife Conservation
According to the directives issued by Nepal government on providing Grant facility for cooperative,-2016 says-mainly there are two types of facility given to the agricultural cooperatives they are: Seed money and capital grant. This facility is given every year as accordance with the arrangement approved budget and programs of ministry of cooperative and poverty alleviation and cooperative department. This facility is given to mainly three types of agricultural cooperatives. First, cooperative
source is economic development. Economic development occurs if there is a reduction in poverty, inequality and unemployment and this will increase the access to obtain improved food, health and rule of law. If the growth occurs with no improvement in living standard for the most of population, the economic development will not take place in development plan which include the targets and policies for reducing poverty, inequality and unemployment. If the long-term economic growth is to be realized for