Part Time Indian Analysis

1136 Words5 Pages
The novel, "The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian" by Alexie Sherman, has come under fire due to some topics discussed within the novel. The novel discusses life on an Indian reservation through the eyes of Arnold “Junior” Spirit, a 14 year old native american boy. The controversial parts of the novel are the language and the topics that are discussed but some people actually praise the novel for its story and underlying messages. “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian” is both seen as as inappropriate and educational for tackling tough topics. The novel takes place in the Spokane Indian Reservation where Junior (the main character) lives. His family and the people of the reservation go through severe poverty, depression,…show more content…
For example, in 2012, the novel was removed from Dade County libraries due to being “vulgar, racist, and anti-christian”. It was also challenged by Cedar Grove Middle School in Wilmington, North Carolina in 2015 for having “racism, bullying, violence, and sexual behavior” (Marshall University). There are many schools within the United States that have tried to ban the novel from their libraries or curriculums because of things discussed. The novel includes sections discussing masturbation, racist jokes, and anti-christian sentiments. Parents of the students that have to read the book are the ones who find the material offensive and inappropriate. The parents do not believe that the novel is appropriate for their children to be reading to the “graphic” content. For example, In 2011, a parent from Montana objected the book due to its “obscene, vulgar, and pornographic language”. However, the novel was not banned from the Helena School District in Montana (Marshall University). Outside of schools, the novel has been controversial nonetheless. The novel, “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian” has been included in American Library Association’s annual list of the most challenged books for 5 years in a row (2010-2014). The ALA believes that the novel is being challenged due to being “anti-family, culturally…show more content…
Many readers of the novel claim that the underlying messages of the novel are more important than the profane content. At Antioch High School, there was a challenge to ban the book by parents after they read sections of the book. They believed it was not appropriate for their child to be reading (Fuller, Ruth). The challenge was dismissed by John Whitehurst, chairman of the english department at Antioch High School, after he read the novel in it’s entirety. After reading the book, Whitehurst determined that the novel is filled with “positive, life-affirming messages” and even has an “anti alcohol” message (Fuller, Ruth). Also, some praise the novel for teaching young adults life lessons and the importance of things in life. The novel apparently teaches the importance of parental support, bravery, good friendships, and perseverance (Cassel, Christi). Arnold, the main character of the novel, is also seen as someone/something that people going through similar struggles can relate to. Another thing people who are against the banning of the novel state is that the main character does not encourage foul language despite using constantly. He just used the language to express his feelings about his situations in life like other people do. However, Arnold did not use inappropriate language in front of girls or to his family or adults. Arnold
Open Document