Marx Alienated Labor

1550 Words7 Pages
Alienation is defined as “a withdrawing or separation of a person or a person's affections from an object or position of former attachment (Merriam-Webster)”. In common uses of the word, it symbolizes a forced, one-sided separation between a person and something they hold dear, like another person or a value. This definition holds true to the Marxist idea of alienation and alienated labor that is a main topic of “The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844”. Marx uses alienation and alienated labor as a stepping stone to criticize many other concepts such as capitalism and the bourgeois/proletariat system that it creates. Karl Marx believes that alienation and alienated labor are a key component of capitalism and that they cause workers…show more content…
This argument casts a critical light on the entire capitalist system while still having its own strengths and weaknesses. The process of alienation in labor is can be looked at as a step by step ladder that starts with a need of productivity and ends with alienation. First, a worker is forced to sell his labor to a capitalist so that the worker can make a wage to survive. The worker’s work eventually becomes less specialized and can be bought at lower values. The labor has now been turned into a commodity where the value comes from the abstract labor power put into it (Tucker 306). The objects being produced become foreign to the worker and that is where alienated labor begins. According to Marx, there are four different conditions for alienated labor. The first type is alienation from the object of one’s labor. This means that the worker who created and put his labor power into an object is not the one who gets to decide what, how, or why the object is produced. For the worker, the object is produced to earn a wage so that he can reproduce himself the next day. The second type of alienated labor comes from alienation of your own labor activity. With this form of alienation, the worker is once again not deciding on his own work process and is being…show more content…
However, because the United States is a strongly capitalist society, his argument may not be the best way to deal with the problems society faces today. His ideas would be useful if we had leaders in the government and in big business that believed that capitalism wasn’t the only working economic model. Until that happens he would have to do now, what he was doing then: appealing to the working class. This is a difficult task to do because the working class is a very large percent of the population with numerous differences and values that come into play when they make decisions. If he did manage to get nearly the entire population to listen to him, he would have to simplify the four branches of alienated labor and also explain why it is a negative thing. People in the United States for the most part trust that the capitalist system works because there is always a hope for social and financial mobility, when in reality this doesn’t happen very
Open Document