Bartleby: The Scrivener And What Work Is

3075 Words13 Pages
Since the beginning of time, there has been a chain of command. Everyone looks to some sort of a higher power for guidance. From the lowest person on the totem pole to the top, people have been under the control of someone or something. There is a certain sense of power and control that is gained with the higher you find yourself on this chain. Over the course of history, some of these powers have shifted and changed the way we think and act. Both, the short story by Herman Melville, Bartleby: The Scrivener and the poem What Work Is by Philip Levine illustrate the power of class distinction in our American history. Bartleby is during the Industrial Revolution, where the economic and social environments took a turn into capitalism. Also, What…show more content…
They show illustrations of the working class being objectified and overpowered by those appointed above them. There is a divide between those of the upper class, who dominate, with the laborers who are barely making ends meet. Karl Marx emphasizes the alienation of the workers in these social environments and the dehumanizing affects it has, which leads to the imprisonment of workers who are forced to rebel against the power that is carried over them. Work place alienation can lead to segregation between workers and their bosses. In the story “Bartleby: The Scrivener,” Melville paints the picture of what it is like to work for a wealthy Wall Street driven New Yorker. The narrator in this story is the employer who owns a law office and has a few employees under him. It’s a small law office that has a lot of work to do, therefore a job position opened. We start to see the personality of the narrator when his new addition arrives to his building. His first impression of Bartleby is one of “the strangest I ever saw or heard of” (Melville 1). Bartleby didn’t even have time to prove him otherwise; the lawyer instantly put him in this category. Therefore, making it more difficult for him to escape this label. The way…show more content…
Karl Marx addresses this as a separation between the laborer and the labor. He poses the idea of workplace alienation. Judy Cox justifies this in her article An Introduction to Marx’s Theory of Alienation. She states, “men no longer enjoyed the right to dispose of what they produced how they chose: they became separated from the product of their labor” (Cox 19). This hidden notion is that there is a mask that is worn by laborers. In a capitalistic economy, the laborers fall at the whim of the wealthy upper class. The threat of losing their job, in a not so thriving economy, would mean the death of them. It would force them and their families into poverty. The production of goods is within the workers hands, but with jobs being scarce, there is nowhere to turn. This detaches them from their selves and the job. Thus, leading to the submissive roles they take on. In Bartleby, the law copyists are machines and act “with submission, sir” (Melville 7). This shows the utter control and power the lawyer has on these men. With an underlying threat to lose their jobs, they are dependent upon the lawyer to survive. He pays their wages, but at a cost of their individual independence. Philip Levine describes in What Work Is, the pure humility there is in when finding a job. In his poem, he illustrates standing, optimistically, in line waiting to apply for
Open Document