Justice In The Odyssey

1142 Words5 Pages
The Republic is one of the most analyzed texts in literature for a reason. It has power behind every word, meaning behind every line, and a lesson on every page. Narrated by Socrates and recorded by Plato, The Republic starts with Socrates going down to see a show with one of his students, Glaucon, on their way back up they are stopped and forced into conversing with a relatively large group of people gathered in a nearby house. Socrates proceeds with enthusiasm and eventually this conversation becomes a whole dialogue that attempts to answer some of the hardest questions in life. Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “There is no knowledge that is not power.” Socrates also believes in the immense power of knowledge and even goes as far as to say…show more content…
Three of the major ideas from the first five books of The Republic are: what does justice look like in an individual, is there a benefit of being just, and a proper education. While having a discussion with Cephalus regarding the benefits and pitfalls of old age, Socrates starts thinking about justice and what it looks like. One idea was that justice is giving what’s due, which raises the question of whether revenge, such as Odysseus’s massacre of his wife's suitors in Homer’s The Odyssey, ever really be just. Even after strenuous debate over the topic, they still couldn’t come up with an adequate description of justice. That’s when Socrates has a revelation and proposes that they have been going about discovering the answer all wrong. He states, “Suppose we had been told by someone to read an inscription in small letters a good way off, and we had not very sharp sight; and then someone noticed the same inscription somewhere else, in larger letters on a larger tablet--that would be a great piece of luck, I think. We could read the large ones…show more content…
He claims that justice only exists due to the fear of each individual of having something unjust happen to them, and if there was no fear of the possible implications of having injustice done to them no one would be just. To illustrate this he recounts a story of a young, poor shepherd that stumbled upon a ring. Later, the shepherd discovered that the ring possessed the ability to render him invisible. Without the fear of punishment, the shepherd proceeds to kill the king, rape the queen, and take over the kingdom. J.R.R. Tolkien actually drew some inspiration from this story to create The Lord of the Rings in which a powerful ring has the ability to render an individual invisible, but the immense power of the ring corrupts the wearer. Glaucon argues that point that humans are inherently unjust creatures and easily corruptible. It is also argued that acting justly isn’t beneficial to the just at all, and that just actions only benefit those individuals who aren’t just. The question is posed whether or not the unjust actually have it better than the just; which was certainly the case with the shepherd who lived a happy pampered life after he murdered his king and usurped his throne. Socrates proposes that if everyone is just then justice will benefit everyone and all it takes for everyone to be just is the proper
Open Document