Sartre and Friedrich Nietzsche didn't focus on traditional morality, but instead an ethics based on authenticity showing a relationship between human creativity and moral values. Sartre and Nietzsche had several similarities in their approaches, but where there are similarities there are also differences. After we take a closer look to some of their ideas and theories, I will argue that Nietzsche goes more in depth in his vision to create a more positive morality. To start, Nietzsche's assessment
Friedrich Nietzsche His philosophy is a philosophy of life, the creation of which has pushed Darwin's theory of the evolution of animals and plants. Acute and original drama and controversy reflected the era of transition from classical philosophy to modern philosophy. We distinguish three phases of his work: The first phase took place in the framework of thinking ideas of antiquity, creativity of Schopenhauer. During this period, written by "The Birth of Tragedy," "Philosophy in the Tragic Age
been ‘constructed’. They, thus, need to be looked at closely, so that we know how such concepts came to existence. One benefit of everything being ‘socially constructed’ is that we do not need to develop new ideas every time we consider an object or theory. General observation is that one sits on a chair and so let that be. If everybody tries to alter the hows obtained from the origin, there would be conceptual conflicts which would lead to collapse of general concepts of the society. Social constructions
Woman: God’s second mistake? Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher, who regarded ‘thirst for power’ as the sole driving force of all human actions, has many a one-liners to his credit. ‘Woman was God’s second mistake’, he declared. Unmindful of the reactionary scathing criticism and shrill abuses he invited for himself, especially from the ever-irritable feminist brigade. The fact and belief that God never ever commits a mistake, brings Nietzsche’s proclamation dashingly down into the dust bin