Electoral College Flaws

676 Words3 Pages
Joe Marianacci, Essay Outline: The Flaws of our Electoral College System I. INTRODUCTION A. Main Argument/Critical Analysis on the following  Is the United States Electoral College a fair way to conduct the presidential election? 1. The Electoral College and why it was enacted.  A compromise of our Founding Fathers between Congress and direct election by the people.  Four separate occasions, the winner of popular vote did not win presidency.  “Winner-take-all System” fail. Over 700 proposals by Congress to reform or eliminate the current Electoral College. Essentially out-casting “The People’s” voice. B. Thesis statement 1. Although many Americans believe our current Electoral system is justified proportionally among the 50 states,…show more content…
c) Electoral votes are not distributed according to population, thus creating weight on individual voters in one State over another. II. BODY A. Support Paragraph 1 1. Presidential candidates focus on specific locations to boost their electoral votes in States that may be the “make or break” for election. Supporting Ideas a. Pandering to large demographics within “swing states” demotes the fundamental roots of democracy. b. Florida and Iowa (Swing States) in recent Presidential cylces. c. Individual voters in smaller states have a larger/more decisive outcome on the election, compared to large States (New York/California) 2. “Four out of five” voters in the national election are “ignored” due to populous states that show no clear favorite. Campaign visits, television advertisements, and various schemes to garner party attention subdue the essence of a Democracy we live in. B. Support Paragraph 2 1. Third parties unlikely win elections, but undoubtedly distort the accuracy of American…show more content…
Third party candidates knowingly play a major impact on the election of major political parties due to leverage and combination of our Electoral system and winner take all system. C. Support Paragraph 3 1. Electoral votes are not distributed according to population, resulting in overrepresentation of small states within the “College”. 2. Supporting Ideas a. An individual voter in Wyoming has triple the weight in electoral votes as opposed to California. Allocating votes on population basis would re-create the system into a democratic synopsis. b. It is possible for a candidate to win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote. Occurred four times thus far in the 56 Presidential elections. c. In 2004, nearly ¾ of the States were ignored during national campaign. Fails to protect State interests.  “One person-one vote”. Small States are considered “safe”. 3. Overrepresentation is a growing concern during Presidential campaigns. Such campaigns neglect the consensus votes, and puts emphasis on battleground states as opposed to a larger Economic desire. III.
Open Document