Electoral College Abolished

1101 Words5 Pages
Electoral College Abolished The United States government is one of the most admired and complex in the world. On the contrary, one of the fundamental components that have an extensive impression on the American People and the Election is the Electoral College. Our founding fathers created The Electoral College over two hundred years ago, and it is still in effect today. They feared that having just the Popular Vote would have given too much power to one person. In this paper, we will be discussing what the Electoral College is, the benefits and disadvantages of the Electoral College as well as if the Electoral College should be abolished or reconstructed. The Electoral College is a procedure that decided the Commander in Chief. Every four years…show more content…
“The American Bar Association calls the electoral college system “archaic” and “ambiguous.”” In the Electoral College system one of the major flaws is winner take all. If a candidate receives fifty one percent of the popular vote that means the candidate receives all the electoral votes. When the winner takes all system is in effect it does not allow for the other votes of that state to count. Not only does winner take all not benefit the people but also the candidate who loses that state. Another down fall to the Electoral College is each state starts off with three elector votes regardless of the size of the state. The rest of the votes are distributed depending on the population of each state. Now the problem with that is the distribution is unequal. For example, California is the largest state in the United States, they get fifty-five electoral votes but in all actuality they should have ten more votes. Compared to a Wyoming that has three electoral votes but because of the population size a Wyoming resident vote counts three times more than a California voter. The Electoral College is basically stating that more people live where they don’t and less people live where they do. Does that make any sense to you? According to Sarah Wheeler “ three times in history in 1876. 1888 and 2000 the candidates won by Electoral College.” That is a five percent fail record. No wonder there as been “seven hundred…show more content…
I think that the United States should implement the Mixed Member Proportional, which is the political system in New Zealand and Germany. The MMP has a two-part ballot, the first part is voting for their favorite candidate and the second part is for a political party, also the number of seats is double on the council. This system ensures that even as a third party candidate even though they might not win the election they would serve in legislative branch. This process allows the people to feel well represented in the government with local issues and concerns. Unlike the Electoral College System the mixed member proportional allows more accuracy with popular votes with out sacrificing local representation. The negative side to MMP is the process can be slightly confusing to a voter but like explained earlier some American’s didn’t realize they were voting for an elector not the president. Another side effect to the MMP system is it can lead to one president who represents the party or one that represents the people. Knowing that every system has its flaws, I would choose the Mixed Member Proportional system over the Electoral College system due to the fact that the people are heard and their votes are more
Open Document