Confidentiality In Research

971 Words4 Pages
It is to make sure that people contribute in the suggested study just when it is compatible with their interests, values, and preferences. It is associated to respect for people and their sovereign decisions, with particular care being taken to secure vulnerable groups (Olasehinde, 2000). The knowledge that is provided to people should be delivered in a form or language that is comprehensible. Among the essential information to be given is the aim of the research, the processes to be performed, the possible risks, the expected advantages and how the data achieved will be maintained private. The aim of informed consent is to make sure that people contribute in the study only when it is compatible with their preferences, values, and interests;…show more content…
Confidentiality and privacy is essential in study; its violation is important, since it respects on an individual in different types like shame, embarrassment, and stigmatization, only to explain a few (Gullifer, and Tyson, 2010). On one hand, privacy is explained as the people’ right to limit access by other individuals in all areas of their personalities, and on the other, confidentiality is explained as the management of knowledge provided to one as a researcher, with the anticipation that the shared data will not be distributed to others without their approval; and if shared, it will be agreed by the…show more content…
Institutional review board (IRB) has the duty to improve integrity about benefits, risks, privacy, and confidentiality. Though, qualitative research could properly produce multifaceted, unanticipated, and unexpected outcomes that can disclose perceptions that are confusing or beyond the real concentration of a study. Different scholars like Charles, Crow, and Wiles, (2006) raised issues about qualitative study and mistakes related with (a) discovery-oriented interview that complicates informed consent and (b) comprehensive interview that can induce a wrong mood state of participants. According to Gullifer, and Tyson, (2010), discovery-oriented interview is associating because of the respondents’ incapability to present real informed consent as they are not informed of how the interview will unfold. Moreover, neither the participants nor the researcher can expect what will transpire in an open-ended qualitative interview session. Interviews are involvements and can be intrusive. So, any negligence or mistake in managing open-ended interview could lawfully implicate Institutional Review Board (IRB) that confirmed the

More about Confidentiality In Research

Open Document