1994 Rwanda Genocide

740 Words3 Pages
The results of 1994 genocide that took place in Rwanda can be traced to the European colonialism era, which successfully delivered the idea of racism and created a divide in the Rwandan population. Before the colonialism period, the Hutu and Tutsi were not considered to be separate tribes, "races" or cultures. They shared the same language and occupied the same land. The most distinct feature that classified an individual to belong to one group versus the other was the number of cattle that a person possessed. Individuals with ten or more cattle were automatically recognized to be Tutsi while the ones with less than ten cows were Hutu. This particular distinction categorized the Hutu and Tutsi as working classes rather then separate races.…show more content…
Being given the ability to receive education, obtain better jobs, and have access to political power, gave this newly empowered group the ability to establish their rule over Hutu. Furthermore, the Tutsi's conversion to Catholicism created an even larger gap and division between these two, now quite distinct, groups. While the Tutsi were receiving the assistance and patronage from the European invaders, the Hutu's anger and resistance grew, and it eventually led to 1959 "Social Revolution." The revolutionary uprising in 1959 was initiated by the Hutu to in hopes of liberating themselves from the rule of the Tutsi. The events resulted in Hutu renouncing their power, and they ultimately sealed radical differences between the two groups. Despite the minor differences that existed between the Hutu and Tutsi before the European colonialism era, the two groups were barely distinguishable and were a part of a strong and powerful kingdom. The differences that existed at the time were mostly determined by a number of assets, and they were not based on "ethnic"…show more content…
However, the lack of knowledge and understanding of the human biological diversity also widely echoed as the consequence of the events. For several hundreds of years, the humans' knowledge of "race" as a concept was primarily based on the visual aspect of the differences in various ethnic groups. This lack of knowledge demonstrated itself in various ways of humans mistreating and disrespecting each other based on physical characteristics. As Europe grew more powerful, and it continued conquering many new lands, the ideals of skin color's significance in determining a person's intelligence level became increasingly prevalent. These notions gave many European leaders the confidence and "right" to seize and overpower countries whose inhabitants' skin color was associated with being more primitive and underdeveloped. Although the idea of "race" began to shift and change in the 20th century, the new concepts were far out of reach for vast majority oaf humanity. Thanks to science it is now a proven fact that there is no biological basis for what people call "race." Perhaps if this knowledge were available at the time of the genocide, the atrocities would have never happened. It is highly unlikely, however, that this fact would have prevented the events from occurring. Racially based violence occurs nowadays on a daily basis all over the world. It seems that no amount of
Open Document