The Purpose Of Punishment

891 Words4 Pages
“The object of punishment is to lift a man up; to stamp out his bad nature and wicked disposition” (Parker n.d.) stated Isaac Parker, a United States District Judge. Like I, he believes that punishment should serve the purpose of reforming a malefactor of society, not worsening them. Is it still justifiable, though, to carry out punishment with revenge on mind? Would it not still serve the same purpose? I say no. Punishment should never be motivated by a desire for revenge because it only implodes a situation. This is because vengeful punishment does not focus on reforming a criminal, runs the risk of punishing more than is justifiable, and may even start a feud between the two (or more) parties at stake. When revenge becomes the main motive…show more content…
What if you destroy any chance for the offender to ameliorate by executing an overly harsh punishment? If your decision to punish comes from your desire for revenge, just such a thing can happen. Take the Hindu epic Ramayana, for example. Prince Rama was exiled to the wilderness along with his brother Lakshman and wife Sita. One day, a demoness by the name of Surpanakha is smitten by Rama and tries to woo him to be her husband. Surpanakha uses magic to enhance her appearance but when Rama refuses, she reverts to her primal form in anger and assaults Sita. Overcome by the desire to take revenge for his brother and his spouse, Lakshman interferes and cuts off Surpanakha’s nose. Humiliated and in pain, she runs away. Did this punishment help reform Surpanakha? No. Might the punishment have been more reasonable if Lakshman wasn’t bent on revenge? Probably. A relatively contemporary literary situation arises from the novel Moby Dick, by Herman Melville. When the whaler Captain Ahab loses his leg to the white whale, Moby Dick, he seeks to punish the whale by killing it. Is this really a fair punishment? Or is this harsh strike a magnification of the captain’s desire for revenge? Even though he didn’t manage to defeat Moby Dick, his intentions were clearly to kill the animal; therefore, proving that, if motivated by revenge, punishment can cause excessive…show more content…
Instead of lifting a man out of his bad nature, a feud would pull many others into it. The catalyst for such a reaction? Revenge. In the recent past, take the San Luca feud, for instance. In Italy, the Strangio-Nirta and the Pelle-Votari-Romeos (two branches of the Ndrangheta Mafia group) were locked in a conflict which lasted until 2000, when a truce was called. The feud commenced in 1991 when a brawl between the two groups resulted in the demise of two Nirta members; as a result, the Romeos massacred four Nirta members. Due to the nature of revenge and the excuse of punishment, violence escalated rapidly; therefore, triggering a feud. However, feuds do not have to start at a charge as severe as murder; instead, they can even smolder in normal life. Let’s look at a school setting; where things can be said insensitively or tauntingly, causing harm. Imagine a situation where a pupil offends another with an insult or even a racial slur. Feeling like the offender should be punished, the “victim” retaliates verbally or even physically. From that point, both parties feel they’ve been wronged and try to get even with each other; thus, sending the entire conflict into a downward spiral. Since everybody is focussed on giving others their comeuppance and not on reforming them, the point of punishment is
Open Document