Roman Empire Research Paper

1273 Words6 Pages
“Every empire grows until its reach exceeds its grasp” . James Corey perfectly explains the fall of one of the greatest empires in history as the Roman Empire grew far too large. Beginning in the eighth century B.C., Ancient Rome grew from a small town on central Italy’s Tiber River into an Empire that at its peak encompassed most of continental Europe, Britain, much of western Asia, northern Africa and the Mediterranean islands. The Roman Empire, at its height, was the most extensive political and social structure in western civilization. The long and triumphant reign of its first emperor, Augustus, began a golden age of peace and prosperity; by contrast, the empire’s decline and fall by the fifth century A.D. was one of the most dramatic…show more content…
Being the Roman emperor had always been a particularly dangerous job, but during the tumultuous second and third centuries it nearly became a death sentence. “Civil war thrust the Empire into chaos, and more than 20 men took the throne in the span of only 75 years, usually after the murder of their predecessor.” The political rot also extended to the Roman people, which failed to temper the excesses of the emperors due to its own widespread corruption and incompetence. This led to the leadership of Rome to be unstable and ungovernable. One of the main causes for the fall of the Roman Empire was the antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor. “In Rome the emperor could collect and spend as he wished. Emperor Nero, always in need of funds, would cry conspiracy, seize the property of an unsuspecting senator and murder him” The Roman Emperor had the legal power to rule Rome’s religious, civil and military affairs with the Senate acting as an advisory body. The relationship between the senate and the emperor deteriorated to a point of distrust. The Roman Empire saw many examples of antagonism between the Senators and the Emperors. As the situation worsened, civic pride waned and many Roman citizens lost trust in their leadership leading to decline of the…show more content…
The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns’ invasion of Europe in the late fourth century. ”When these Eurasian warriors rampaged through northern Europe, “they drove many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire, and the Romans let them in.” The Romans grudgingly allowed members of the Visigoth tribe to cross south of the Danube and into the safety of Roman territory, but they treated them with extreme cruelty. In brutalizing the Goths, the Romans created a dangerous enemy within their own borders. When the oppression became too much to bear, the Goths rose up in revolt and eventually routed a Roman army and killed the Eastern Emperor Valens during the Battle of Adrianople in A.D. 378. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire’s borders. “The Romans fought for a time but was eventually defeated “in 410 the Visigoth King Alaric successfully sacked the city of Rome.” In 476, the Germanic leader Odoacer staged a revolt and deposed the Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From then on, no Roman emperor would ever again rule from a post in Italy. The invasion of the barbarians occurred due to other instabilities throughout the empire, and the sacking of the roman cities signaled the end of the
Open Document