Research may be defined as “an endeavour to discover new or collate old facts etc. by the scientific study of a subject or by a course of critical investigation” (Oxford Concise Dictionary, 1995). This definition clearly emphasizes the importance of methodologies as it pertains to researching a subject matter. It is for this reason that it is extremely essential that the researcher adequately considers the relative merits of a range of possible methodologies along with their associated data needs
Method and methodology The qualitative and quantitative methodologies derive from their respective scientific philosophy or paradigm. Each paradigm has its own ontology and epistemology. The ontological position states how the paradigm perceives the reality and the epistemology is concerned with the nature of and the scope of knowledge (Slevitch, 2011). This, the logic of justification, not only differs between the qualitative and quantitative paradigm but is opposites (ibid). The ontology of
The Research Process and Methodology Student’s Name: Institutional Affiliation: The Research Process and Methodology The research process begins with the identification of the subject to be researched; this could be a problem that needs a solution, or a prediction that needs to be proven. After the identification of the subject, it is thoroughly reviewed and all the facts about the subject drafted. The next step is the formation of a hypothesis which acts as a guideline for the proposal. With the
CHAPTER THREE 3.0 Research Methodology 3.1 Research Design This section describes the major procedures that will be used in carrying out the research. This study is multi-site mixed method case study that will employ a Concurrent Triangulation Mixed-Method design. Using a multisite mixed methods approach, the study will strive to appraise selected peri-urban settlements situated on the fringes of Port Harcourt. 3.1.1 A Multisite Mixed Methods Approach A Multi-site case study investigates a defined
0 Introduction Data collection methods are generally classified into two, a qualitative method and a quantitative one. This can be seen as a conventional classification, somewhat of a distinction which can be helpful to writers but at certain instances may also be misleading. Many students and scholars come to realise in their studies, that they are not fully aware of the distinction arising between these two research methods. A common mistake is thinking that these two terms are identical and may
examination i.e. descriptive, explanatory and exploratory. For extra thinking for the particular realities and for modifying the nice relationship between variables of the examination focus on, the exploratory examination is capable in these examination methodologies. Exploratory examination is portrayed as the beginning examination into a hypothetical or theoretical thought. This is the spot a researcher has a thought or has investigated something and tries to audit more and collect information about the theme
proposal. These two techniques are quantitative and qualitative analyses; it is important for the researcher to understand the difference between both techniques. Qualitative inquiry is primarily exploratory research. It is used to gain an understanding of the underlying ground , popular opinion, and motivations. It provides perceptivity into the problem or assist to develop a musical theme or hypotheses for potential quantitative research. Qualitative Research is also used to uncover trends in thought
what relationship the researcher has with the research subject - how do we get knowledge and how we discover new things. Ontological beliefs will dictate epistemological beliefs. In other words, what the researcher believes about the nature of reality will dictate what kind of relationship they think the researcher should have with whatever is being studied. There are two basic beliefs about how we should gather new knowledge. Realists believe that research should be done in an objective way so that
Chapter 3 Methodology In public health research, there are two specific paradigms or design. It could be a qualitative or interpretative design or a quantitative or positivist design. These designs direct the kinds of literature review and the direction to take in the research process.(Greenhalgh, 2001). Following my research questions, the qualitative design is a good design to use. The qualitative design is empirical; it observes what people in a population feel about a particular condition. It
Section III. Choice of Research Method: Quantitative, Qualitative or Mixed? The selection of data analysis techniques to deal with research questions or hypotheses and the techniques chosen for the data collection is informed and guided by what we call the research method. Hence, research method is a procedure, and also the analytical techniques to be chosen and the methods to be chosen will also be dictated by the choices of the methodologies made and by the theoretical framework (Sumner and Tribe