approaches, but where there are similarities there are also differences. After we take a closer look to some of their ideas and theories, I will argue that Nietzsche goes more in depth in his vision to create a more positive morality. To start, Nietzsche's assessment of morality is directed to the existence of a universal morality. He argues that an absolute morality forces values upon the people in a society, which interests only a selective group of people. Nietzsche also believes that the distinction
therefore, this can represent the necessary state of complete solitariness according to Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. However, Shadow did not stay in a state of complete solitariness due to the influence of Wednesday. Shadow agreed upon entering Wednesday’s world by working for him, but little did he know that Wednesday would play a bigger role in his life than by just being his boss. Therefore, it can be argued that Shadow did not correctly complete his own self-realization (existentialism) due to the incorrect
“A new species would bless me as its creator and source”: Romantic and Byronic Influence in Frankenstein Leading to Nietzsche's Theory of Existentialism The word “Byronic” derives from the creator of this hero archetype, Lord Byron of 19th century England, who proposed a hero that complemented the Romanticism’s hero in many forms. Lord Byron’s archetype demonstrated psychological and sentimental complexity that the Romantic hero lacked in many respects. A Byronic hero is perceived as an extreme version
Philosophy is an interpretation of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, existence, and moral values. No particular philosophy can necessarily be proven true; however, some interpretations are more cogent than others. Two great philosophers of the nineteenth century were John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Nietzsche. While both great philosophers, Mill and Nietzsche have radically different interpretations of moral values. Mill’s ethics are based upon the principle of utility which “holds that
God’s second mistake’, he declared. Unmindful of the reactionary scathing criticism and shrill abuses he invited for himself, especially from the ever-irritable feminist brigade. The fact and belief that God never ever commits a mistake, brings Nietzsche’s proclamation dashingly down into the dust bin of nonsense. Whatever Almighty God has created is beautiful and useful. His creative powers are fabulous, beyond the purlieus of any kind of fallacy. God created Adam and Eve – both the remarkable assets