Making A Murderer Film Analysis

771 Words4 Pages
After watching Making A Murderer a lot of viewers are really questioning if Steven Avery is a murderer or is someone that was wrongly convicted for the second time. Entertainment Weekly is sharing that former Wisconsin state prosecutor Ken Kratz is sharing that Netflix didn't share a huge piece of key evidence in their show Making A Murderer about Steven Avery. Kratz really feels like viewers might think differently if they knew everything. Steven Avery prosecutor said Netflix series #MakingAMurderer omitted key evidence — People magazine (@people) December 30, 2015 Ken Kratz actually contacted People via email about Making A Murderer and shared his thoughts. Here is what Ken had to say about Steven Avery's case.…show more content…
In Making A Murderer, Steven Avery has been convicted for the murder of a young photographer, Teresa Halbach and is currently serving life in prison without the possibility of parole. Avery still to this day says that he was framed. Ken Kratz refused to be filmed for the movie and share his point of view. Kratz feels like Avery actually targeted Halbach and is sharing a few details. Kratz says that Halbach was "creeped out by him." In email, he explained more. She [went to her employer and] said she would not go back because she was scared of him. Kratz says that when Tersea Halbach showed up the first time to do the photo shoot for Autotrader, Steven was wearing only a towel. He later called up there and asked them to send her back once again and he did want the same girl. He allegedly gave his sister’s name and number to "trick" Halbach into coming. Kratz went on to explain some phone calls that Making A Murderer fans need to know about when making an opinion on if Steven Avery is a murderer or

More about Making A Murderer Film Analysis

Open Document