would be created if a Machiavellian prince were to lead would be beneficial solely to the prince, as the prince would have absolute power of the state and would be able to ruthlessly destroy anyone who stood in his way. The people wouldn’t be able to trust each other, or the government, as the ruler would attempt to deceive them at all points. The rich elite class could have all their power given or taken whenever the ruler felt like it. Meanwhile, the prince would be completely alone and unthreatened
becomes a prince and rescues a beautiful princess? This charming, heart warming tale, entertains all ages as the audience gradually falls in love with each engaging character. Every young girl dreams of her own prince and every boy imagines himself a dashing hero. Most are not likely to consider the possibility of enchanting Aladdin having similar characteristics to a Machiavellian ruler. Looking closely, however, at the four key qualities described in “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli will reveal
mind when the word "prince" comes out. People think about a prince as a person who is perfect such that he is a hero, defeats his nation against enemies, and helps citizens. This is the definition of a prince in the function stories. Can a prince be that wonderful in real life? The purpose of having a leaders is to set performance for nation's benefits, cooperation with people for general advantages, and organize the community. Therefore, my argument is that leaders, like princes, are responsible to
There are so many traits, values, attitudes and strategies Putin has which are very similar to Niccolo Machiavelli. Putin is the current president of Russia and he has been in power since 1999. He served in the Russian submarine fleet in the 1930s and earlier he served in the World War 2 in destruction battalion of the NKVD. Putin is a figure that maintains effective political and military power, fully under his control. He also is famous for displaying his strong masculinity in the public, is a sixth