'Dulce Et Decorum Est And Futility'

1488 Words6 Pages
Wilfred Owen’s poetry addresses the horrors of war and the loss of innocence and its purpose was to inform the audience about the brutality of war. Wilfred Owen has become one of the most significant poets of the First World War, with his documentation on war. In 1917, when poet Wilfred Owen was recovering from shell shock at Craiglockhart Hospital, he became friends with fellow soldier and established poet Siegfried Sassoon who encouraged him to write poems to relieve himself of the terrifying nightmares that overcame him. Wilfred Owen wrote about the suffering and pity of war from his firsthand experience of war. In “Dulce et Decorum Est” and “Futility”, Owen skillfully exhibits war’s overwhelming and senseless waste of life and its devastating…show more content…
In “Dulce et Decorum Est”, Owen uses sensory language to convey the intensity, pain and futility of war. We are able to see the soldiers as shown in “blood-shod” and also hear them when they are “guttering”, “choking” and “drowning”. This appalling and gruesome image demonstrates a confronting portrayal reality of war as we sympathise for the soldiers who have to endure so much. The personification of dreams “smothering”, suggests a nightmarish death and portrays the image that the narrator is unable to escape the frightening nightmares that occur frequently. The strong descriptive language in “white eyes writhing” and “froth-corrupted lungs” clearly demonstrates how ghastly and horrific his death is. The use of continuous present participle form in “smothering”, “choking” and “drowning” suggests the continuity of the actions which will replay in the soldiers’ minds long after the event. This is a mental condition which is knows as ‘shell shock’ in World War I is now known as PTSD(Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). In the “Voices in the Wartime”, Jonathan Shay says “There will always be psychological injuries in war just like there will be physical injuries”. The high modality of “will always” shows that harsh reality of war and how soldiers’ lives are severely impacted because they have to live with PTSD for the rest of their lives. Also, David…show more content…
In the opening stanza of “Dulce et Decorum Est”, Owen uses ironic subversion to show the state of the soldiers. We assume the soldiers who are described as “bent double, “like old beggars”, “coughing”, “blind” and “deaf” are frail and old. It is when the pace of the poem suddenly quickens and they respond to the gas attack that we realise that they are really young men who are deliberately shown as old through their fatigue and injury. They are depicted as worn and exhausted. The juxtaposition between “Gas! GAS! Quick boys!” and “flung” shows a change in the soldier’s attitude which indicates that they have seen too much death already and they have become desensitised. Jonathan Shay in “Voices in the Wartime” says “People who have been through heavy fighting where many people have died seem to carry a kind of imprint of death on them where the dead are more real to them than the living. Owen speaks of such people as the men whose mind the dead have ravaged”. The symbolism of death shows the burden the soldiers have to to carry at such a young age and mental state is deteriorated mainly because there are many young soldiers who weren’t expecting the chaotic state of war. Irony is present in the title of “Dulce et Decorum Est” which translates to "It is sweet and right to die for one's country". This was taught to young men to lure them into
Open Document