The Crucible Play Analysis

613 Words3 Pages
Mitch Mackenzie Miss Shively Literature 24 September 2015 Some scholars would classify "The Crucible" by Arthur Miller as a "Morality Play," and to that, attention must be brought must be brought to these assertions, Proctor's infidelity, Abigail's accusations, and Parris' greed. To start, a Morality Play is a play in which a person must choose between good and evil (Dictionary.com). One character exhibiting these is Proctor, who made a choice to cheat on his wife, and to put it behind him for his wife in her time of need. Though not outright saying it, Proctor is clearly sorry for and even embarrassed by his actions. This is important because it shows Proctor's war with evil, and that good is starting it's slow but powerful take over. This point of view also represents how many adulteresses cope with their deeds. Also, Proctor's attempts to right his wrongs when his wife truly needs him. This shows his dedication to his wife even after his moment of weakness, and how he still cares for her. It also his stride to reach goodness in…show more content…
Abigail's desire to continue her illicit relationship after exposure and Proctor putting an end to it shows her desire to do wrong. This shows the evil in her because she very clearly realizes the wrong in what she does, but adamantly tries to continue the wrong. It also displays that she no desire to let the past be the past, or except that Proctor wants no further part of her. Furthermore, Abigail's wrongful persecutions, which even led to the deaths of many, shows she has chosen evil to the end. This matters because to simply avoid a bit of trouble that she could have maybe gotten off with a slap on the wrist, she turned Salem and all of New England upside-down and literally directly called the executions of several innocent people. This evil is one that persists and likely can never be trumpeted by good,

More about The Crucible Play Analysis

Open Document