Slave Narrative Analysis

963 Words4 Pages
The validity of slave narratives was the driving influential force behind any motivation that that the narrative attempted to convey on readers. The narrative of slaves were written for a variety of purposes, but it was the slaves’ true accounts that served to educate and inspire the ignorant white majority. Slave narratives and slave writing were not published without sufficient investigation of their truthfulness. These biographical events were truthful, nevertheless the narratives were still edited by the white majority to serve the popular interest of that time period. The writers of slave narratives did not publish and exhibit their works before experiencing an investigation on the validity of events. John Sekora noted the reassessment…show more content…
Abolitionists gave the writers of the narratives common themes for their works. The slaves used their personal struggles to be the voice for multitudes of slaves in captivity. These former slaves also realized that while pleading for their cause, white Americans would critique and judge their moral decisions, thoughts, and actions in their narratives collectively (Gates, 2). The former slaves who wrote and spoke at antislavery events all used their individual experiences to educate the audience on the typical life of a slave. Abolitionists were cautious of how their commentary was presented and how that could affect the judgement of the white American…show more content…
However, they did not appease their readers with their own personal autobiographical feelings. Their feelings were written in a way to embody a specific interest of the time period. WM. Lloyd Garrison persuaded readers in preface of The Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglas. He used rhetoric to describe how Fredrick Douglas’s narrative will inspire the reader to join in on the antislavery opinions. He says, “The experience of Frederick Douglass, as a slave, was not a peculiar one…Yet how deplorable was his situation!…What still more shocking outrages were perpetrated upon his mind!” (viii-ix) Garrison continues to describe how Douglas will attempt to plea for his freedom and the freedom of his brethren. Garrison’s line clearly sells his advertises his message to the public, “Inscribe on the banner which you unfurl to the breezed, as your religious and political motto- “No Compromise with Slavery! No Union with Slaveholders!” (xii). Fredrick Douglas suffered terrible and true life events. However, Douglas does not write on behalf of himself, but almost as a salesperson on behalf of the American Antislavery Society to plead for ending
Open Document