Religious Exemptions In The United States

1152 Words5 Pages
Religious Exemptions are more often being singled out for special treatment. For example, objection to warfare. Many civilians were against violence and war because of their religious beliefs. Another example is being against gay marriage being legal in all 50 states. Religious exemptions are becoming more of a “big deal” because it is being used as a weapon. Religion is part of most cultures.That being said, religious exemptions are becoming more used and powerful in the United States today. As of summer 2015, gay marriage was legalized in all 50 states. This was the act of allowing same sex couples to expand their relationship statuses. For a lot of civilians this was a big mark in American history. As of the people against this act, it created…show more content…
In religious views, marriage was defined with a man and a women. The Bible, in Leviticus 18:22, says: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination," Also, marriage leads to procreation, people of religion often believe that if a daughter is growing up without a father, she is more than likely to be sexually active before marriage. Not just causing early pregnancies but also breaking the religion. For example, no sex before marriage. There are many arguments that state that what one person does with with their body is their own decision, no matter the religious views. There is no way someone can define another person by what they wear, what they do for a living, or who they plan to marry. Religion can make a person. Just like drugs can make a person. Religion has people view things in religious ways, as drugs make people see things a certain…show more content…
This goes for a hotel owner who refuses a hotel room for a couple on a honeymoon, or a caterer that did not want to cater food for a wedding reception for a same sex couple. Religious marriage exemptions are made to make sure that LGBT rights end where a religious objection begins. President Obama’s statement on the Obergefell decision included “I know that Americans of goodwill continue to hold a wide range of views on this issue. Opposition in some cases has been based on sincere and deeply held beliefs. All of us who welcome today’s news should be mindful of that fact; recognize different viewpoints; revere our deep commitment to religious freedom.”.(Pg 9) Back in Oberefell, the chief Justice Roberts called out justice Kennedy’s thoughts and opinions on those on the other side of the debate. The term is bigots. Bigots is someone that holds different opinions, in this case the people against religious exemptions. Kennedy did not refer to the people as bigots or homophobes.”Rather, the Chief Justice takes Justice Kennedy to task for saying that “ ‘the necessary consequence’ of laws codifying the traditional definition of marriage is to ‘demean] or stigmatize]’ same-sex couples.”245 The Chief Justice warns that “[these apparent assaults on the character of fair minded people will have an

More about Religious Exemptions In The United States

Open Document