Punishment In The Scarlet Letter

991 Words4 Pages
Public Shaming Humans are social creatures, we strive to make friends and build a great reputation for ourselves. Anything that may ruin this reputation scares us, which is how shame based punishments work. When a criminal is publicly humiliated, they will change their ways to make sure they never have to face that again. These punishments seem like they are a great alternative to prison time, but in reality, they only isolate the offender. Plus, in today’s society social media unpredictably exaggerates the punishments, leaving the criminal to the mercy of the web. One of these shame based punishments takes place in the book The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The offender, Hester Prynne, has to wear a scarlet letter on her chest for…show more content…
In fact, it commonly does the opposite, during this time of isolation the perpetrator often has a newfound freedom. Since they are no longer told to conform to society they can think for themselves. This is what happens to Hester Prynne in The Scarlet Letter. After her isolation, Hawthorne explains, “She assumed a freedom of speculation … but which our forefathers, had they known it, would have held to be a deadlier crime than stigmatized by the scarlet letter” (Hawthorne 186). Her punishment did not teach her to become a better person, it only taught her to become a better thinker. Long-standing punishments such as the scarlet letter are not effective forms of public-shaming since the offender never has a chance to redeem themselves. On a similar note these same punishments drive some people to become non-conformists, and seeing this may not deter others from committing crimes as justice-seekers may hope. Cole Stryker asks the question about public shaming for pedophiles, “Does it deter others from engaging in pedophilic acts, or does it drive them to darker corners and sneakier tactics?” (Stryker). The fear of public humiliation is not enough to drive others away from the crimes, especially if they believe the isolation can almost be beneficial. Since these punishments are often not effective, then there is no point in taking the risk to see if…show more content…
These so-called vigilantes believe by calling out criminals, they are making the web and the world a better place. But, in reality this often backfires or creates a punishment much more severe than the offender deserves. For instance, one woman tweeted a photo of two men who had been making offensive comments in hopes of getting them fired. It worked, but so much backlashed ensued towards her and her company, that in the end she was also let go (Stryker). With the amount of justice seekers there are on the internet, there are also many racist and sexist users ready to defend their friend at any time. This backlash only makes shame based punishments worse, since the citizens trying to do good also end up being humiliated. Social media also creates for a society in which shame based punishments are unpredictable. Punishments are made to fit the crime, but with social media “it’s impossible to predict how many photos and videos the news media and random passerby may produce … Maybe it will become a viral sensation” (Beato). When the punishment itself is unpredictable, it is not fair to sentence a criminal to public humiliation. Someone who may have sent out one offensive tweet can receive a punishment harsher than a person convicted of DWI. For this reason, social media only worsens they effects of shame based punishments, therefore especially in
Open Document