Canadian writing. Due to Canada's proximity to the United States of America, Canadians are often swamped by the surrounding American culture. Unfortunately, this is relatively common in Canadian history as Canada has always been a "branch plant" of another country; starting with England and France. Canada being a "branch plant" is unfortunate as Canadian culture has not been able to develop. Likewise, being under the thumb of other powerful cultures, for years, Canadian students would study British writers
this identity such as government institutions, corporate businesses and individuals it will become clear that there are inconsistencies regarding this association. The 1920s and the impact of prohibitionists, the reduction of British control over Canada through the 1930s, and a reinvigoration of the connection between nature and national identity to avoid overt Americanisation from the 1970s in an increasingly globalised world economy are all significant factors in shaping this association. However
individuals and the physical environment also encompasses a deep sense of belonging to a society, a land, a culture and community, being indispensable to one's existence. In the early 1970s Canadian cultural nationalism positioned wilderness as mark of difference as well as an object of ecological
contextualized them in a framework of nation building. In this essay I will analyze the scope of the book as well as the sources used and their relationship to the development of the myth for Canadians during the Great War.
Canada and the United States are two of the most diverse countries due to the large amount of immigrants accepted yearly. With the amount of immigrants accepted into Canada, there is a question if they should be allowed to vote as non-citizens. In most countries, having the right to vote is given to individuals who have citizenship in that particular country. However, in some places within different countries, they allow non-citizens who are permanent residents to vote in local elections, but in
Over the years Nigeria has witnessed several empty, jabberwocky inordinate promises from our political gladiators who has used the magic of language to cajole many. However, language serves as a strong tool that our political leaders used for easy communication of thought that enhance winning of political mandate. This paper shows how language is used in politics as a tool to communicate thought and how language is used as a train to which political leaders convey meaning to the heart of Nigerians