My Papa's Waltz

1047 Words5 Pages
When thinking of poetry, what are the first things that come to mind? For most, that would be rhyming, use of metaphors, and a stylistic flow to express some thing or idea the writer wants to get across. Those are all, indeed, very important to understanding the meaning and purpose of the work. However, most people tend to gloss over the true effect that sounds can have on a piece of writing. Rhyming is not an inherit part of poetry; in fact, poems do not necessarily have to rhyme at all. It is all a part of the author’s choice, and depends on the effect they want to get across. It is not some arbitrary standard; it is used to achieve a certain function or flow within the piece. To tie it together, and encode some sort of meaning beyond what…show more content…
The piece describes, from the little boy’s point of view, his “waltz” with his father. The poem consists of four stanzas with four lines each, and every other line has some sort of rhyme. This gives the poem a calm and somewhat relaxing tone; like a waltz. This can be seen to represent how the boy feels. It can be easily interpreted that the boy has some sort of comfort with his drunken father, despite being manhandled by him, from how at the end he was “still clinging to your [his father’s] shirt” (Roethke 687). One interesting thing about this poem is its meaning can be interpreted as either in violent or playful context. It all depends on the reader’s interpretation on how the scene is being described. The rhyme scheme seems to actually reflect this. Some rhymes are regular, like “death” and “breath”, whiles others are merely slant rhymes, like “pans” and “countenance” (Roethke 687). A clear pattern between the use of slant rhymes and perfect ones is not evident, and the two rhyming types are used interchangeably throughout. This irregularity and discordance can be seen to reflect the relationship between the father and child. It shows how there is something amiss between them, and as a result, helps convey that there can be multiple interpretations of the meaning through interchangeable context. In addition, it should be noted that the third and last…show more content…
It is written with a pleasant flow, and has a slight light-hearted feel, even though it is dealing with a more serious and emotional topic. Between the two alternating rhymes of “master” and “disaster”, disaster is the one that comes out in the end, and even forces Bishop to make herself “Write It!” (Bishop 986). She appears to have been trying to build herself up in order to writer the word “disaster”. “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” is repeated, as it stands to make the piece appear as though it’s stuck in a loop (Bishop 985). She is aware that it all ends in disaster, so it gives the effect as if she is trying to delay the inevitable end. It seems she is forcing herself to move on from this stand still; giving closure to both the poem, and her own personal loss. This ultimately ties the meaning of the poem together with its form. Without it, Bishop’s desired effect may not have been as powerful or emotional to the

More about My Papa's Waltz

Open Document