Karl Marx's Contribution To The Critique Of Political Economy
823 Words4 Pages
Mr. Karl Marx mentioned in Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy that “In the social production of their existence, men enter into definite, necessary relations, who are independent of their will, namely, relations of production corresponding to a determinate stage of development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation on which there arises a legal and political superstructure and to which there correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the social, political and intellectual life-process in general. It is not the consciousness of men that determines…show more content… It expands along with the development of private ownership.
The Politics institution is emerged with the birth of a Nation, it develops and struggles along with the various interest groups competing and safeguarding for state sovereignty.
With the development of the Nation, the economic development has been affected by political institution with constraint and regulation. When the political environment is stable and liberal, the economic development will be smooth; on the contrary, the economic development will be stagnation and depression.
1.1.1 The role of economy on political institution
Fundamentally, the economy is as a medium of education in order to impact on the political institution. While the economy is relatively depressed or backward, then this will necessarily affect the further popularization of social education. So the shortage of education resources will come about monopoly situation which is the knowledge is monopolized by a few rich people. When the most people are in the ignorant, conservative and cowardly situation, then the despotic politics is naturally…show more content… Because of the despotic governor will be the personal benefit above all over the interests of the whole society. In order to preserve their dominant interests, they must build level and enslave mental and control words and deeds. In this closed and unjust environment, people gradually lost their independence and creativity and positivity so that also makes the economic development to lost power. At the same time, the dictator regulates the economic activities without according to the market discipline, but to regulate various economic activities rely on the mandatory plan. They make a decision not by what they effectively manage but by what power holder’s individual will to do that. This series of behavior are contrary to the normal regulation so that will lead social economy to chaos and