Intentional Tort

824 Words4 Pages
Battery is an illustration of intentional tort. A battery appears when the litigant has intentionally generated an abhorrent touching to an object which is physically correlated with the plaintiff. In both criminal and civil law, a battery is the purposeful touching of, or applying of force to, the body of other individual, in a hurtful or damage manner, and without permission. A battery can generally be muddled with an assault, which is simply the action of making fear to make a battery, or of making another in fear or foreboding of an approaching and prompt battery. A battery is commonly ever anticipated by an assault, and, hence, the terms are generally used evolutionally or united, as in "assault and battery." Another approach to consider…show more content…
It is said that "personal indignity is the essence of an action for battery. For a tortuous battery to occur, the requisite intent is merely to touch or make contact without consent. Therefore, a charge of battery can be brought for contact with anything that can be "practically identified" with the body, such as clothing or something held in the hand. Furthermore, there is no requirement that a victim is aware of the contact - the victim can be asleep or unconscious . It need not be an intention to do wrong, and the wrongdoer need not intend to cause the particular harm that…show more content…
The standard for assault obliges purpose to hurt or to place somebody in trepidation of prompt damage. The intention and in addition the demonstration makes an assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent— if assailant intends to bring about the trepidation of hurtful or hostile contact in the casualty—or general intent—in the event that he or she means to do the demonstration that causes such fear. There can be no assault if the demonstration does not create a genuine worry of damage in the casualty. There must be a sensible trepidation of harm. The typical test connected is whether the demonstration would prompt such trepidation in the brain of a sensible individual. The status of the victim is taken into account. Basically all jurisdictions concur that the victim must be conscious of the menace. This fundamental is not required, however, for the tried battery form of assault. A litigant who throws a rock at a sleeping victim can only be responsible of the trying battery or assault, since the victim would not be aware of the possible

More about Intentional Tort

Open Document