Human Nature In The Great Gatsby

708 Words3 Pages
Human nature directs people to acquire as many possessions as possible. As a corrupt society formed on the basis of unfavorable moral or ethical personal values, human beings possess these treacherous traits that are easily malleable. Referenced by Plato, the detriment of ownership can be catastrophic to one's morals. The desire to retain these objects and objectives can destroy personal character. Not only do our innate instincts of greed and self-benefit peak from material ownership, but our desire for reputable social standing. The more objects obtained, the higher the social prestige. Increasing the ability to obtain these objects only raises the social rank; the vicious cycle constantly turns to no end. Characterizing the human nature…show more content…
Society values material possessions as the epitome of life and forces its inhabitants to place the same importance on definite objects. Jay Gatsby, in the infamous novel lives exclusively behind this claim. He internally corrupts based on societal values of materialism ingrained within its constituents brains. Gatsby’s excess capital propels him to covet more and more materials even though he already has enough. Like many people today, he attempts to value his own worth at the amount of possessions he could acquire. Gatsby’s success only produces more greed from him and influences those around him to do the same. Eventually his gluttonous actions drive him to a point where he conforms to the misshapen values of society. Ownership of material possessions can only be acquitted to the impact of corrupted societal ideals. Society creates depraved personal beliefs formulated on ownership not only of materials but of particular characteristics, such as greed. Resulting from the distraught teachings of society, unfavorable characteristics are validated through ownership of material possessions. Illuminated by Gatsby’s actions, human lust for greed is driven by distorted societal ideals and a civil norm of…show more content…
The mounting societal ideal of what is valuable and what is not is consistently becoming more and more skewed. Consuming our lives with a focus on materials our beliefs are the ones to suffer. Ownership of these tangible objects only creates an appetite for more, which in turn, can only lead to disrupted personal values. Into The Wild, by Jon Krakauer, provides insight into an example of this kind of moral disintegration. It talks of a family who knew what it was like to be without and how they rose to a wealthy lifestyle. Once the reached their goal, they didn’t stop, they never took time from their day to spend with their kids. a majority of the family's time was spent attempting to gain more money. Their son, Chris, understood that wealth was shameful and “inherently evil”. The family’s desire to attain more knowledge and material possessions rendered them unethical and morally corrupt. The human nature of personal gain was brought to light through the actions of the family. Another time in the novel, this particular family offers to buy their son a car and pay for the rest of his college, at law school. They feel as though they can buy his respect. The corruption that the material possessions have brought this family has disfigured their ability to tell between right and wrong. Induced by ownership of objects and objectives, people are easily malleable in
Open Document