Hobbes Vs Locke

655 Words3 Pages
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two of the most important modern political thinkers. Hobbes was an English philosopher, best known today for his work on political philosophy. His 1651 bookLeviathan established social contract theory, the foundation of most later Western political philosophy. Locke was an English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers. Locke's most important and influential political writings are contained in his Two Treatises on Government. Hobbes and Locke are both social contract and natural law theorists, but this is where the resemblance ends. When it comes to the social contract Hobbes believes the state come into existence because of the social contract. The contract forms the state and it is the fiduciary in which the people participate to set the state. Locke believe humans entered into the social contract to avoid any inconveniences. Locke believed that social contract occurred when men would transfer some or all of their rights to the government in order to ensure a comfortable living. Hobbes believed once humans were in a social contract there was not getting out of the contract. Locked said there are two steps. The first step, people make a…show more content…
Hobbes believed that on the off chance that you simply do what you are essentially advised, you are sheltered. You won't be abusing the social contract in light of the fact that you don't have the privilege to revolt. When it comes to governement Hobbes believed in a absolute royal monarchy and absolutism for the sovereign. Locke believed in limited government and he called for a representative form of government. Locke believed the government could change, but the state remained. Hobbes believe that must give up right for the state to be effective. Locke believe that one did not have to giver up all

More about Hobbes Vs Locke

Open Document