Heart Of Darkness Analysis

6370 Words26 Pages
English Language and Literature Studies; Vol. 5, No. 1; 2015 ISSN 1925-4768 E-ISSN 1925-4776 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education 13 Historicizing Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness: A Critique of King Leopold II’s Colonial Rule Isam Shihada1 1 Associate Professor of English Literature and Gender Studies, Department of English, Gaza Strip, Palestine Correspondence: Isam Shihada, Associate Professor of English Literature and Gender Studies, Department of English, Gaza Strip, Palestine. E-mail: isams@hotmail.com Received: October 26, 2014 Accepted: January 4, 2015 Online Published: February 25, 2015 doi:10.5539/ells.v5n1p13 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ells.v5n1p13 Abstract This study examines how Conrad's Heart of Darkness…show more content…
3. Historicisizing Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness: A Critique of King Leopold II’s Colonial Rule After spending six memorable yet hellish months in the Congo, one may argue that witnessing the murder, forced labor, and other atrocities committed by King Leopold II’s agents in the Congo Free State inspired Joseph Conrad to write his novella, Heart of Darkness. Conrad's experience most certainly provided “a basis for the indignation” of Heart of Darkness (Watts, 1996, p. 48). Conrad’s trip may also account for his realistic depiction of the atrocities perpetrated in the Congo Free State, summed up in Conrad's own words: “Heart of Darkness is experience … pushed a little (and only very little) beyond the actual facts of the case” (Conrad, 1999, p. 64). The fact that Conrad had lived for a few months in the Congo “gives Heart of Darkness an authenticity that undoubtedly has contributed to its enduring power and appeal” (Firchow, 2002, p. 22). In other words, Heart of Darkness was actually based on real events and people Conrad either saw or heard about.Therefore, a historical understanding of the Congo Free State is crucial to our understanding of Heart of Darkness and its implicit…show more content…
These skulls belonged to the Congolese rebels who refused to comply with Kurtz’s orders or who complied but failed to produce the designated quota of ivory. They were consequently punished by execution. Furthermore, we understand that Kurtz’s decoration of his house with heads could be a sign of power and a stern warning that this will be the same fate for those who refuse to obey orders or fail to collect ivory. Within this context, Michiko Kakutani (1998) writes that Conrad’s Heart of Darkness records in detail “the actual facts of King Leopold II’s brutal rule of Congo in 1890, just as one of history’s most heinous acts of mass killing was getting under way” (p. 1). Indeed, King Leopold II’s hypocrisy is seen in the way he calls his agents “all powerful protectors and benevolent teachers who are engaged in the work of material and moral regeneration” (Brunner & Mills, 2003, p.8). Therefore, we find Kurtz perceiving himself as a defender of high principles and an author of a report on “The Suppression of Savage Customs.” It is ironically the same prevalent Oriental thinking to which
Open Document