Examples Of Logical Fallacies In Trial By Fire

532 Words3 Pages
Logical Fallacies in Trial by Fire A suspect is innocent until proven guilty, right? This is because the scientific method, when applied in investigations, means that evidence is collected in order to find a hypothetical suspect. This suspect is considered innocent until further evidence fails to exonerate him. Nevertheless, this concept was anything but true in the case of Todd Willingham who was wrongly executed for the alleged crime of burning his three kids alive. Once a suspect becomes prone to capital punishment and hope for justice for the victims appear, biases intervene and trigger numerous logical fallacies which can lead to wrongful convictions. From the moment Willingham was placed as suspect, all evidence was traced back to him

More about Examples Of Logical Fallacies In Trial By Fire

Open Document